• mercano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    Sad, from a nostalgia point of view, but probably a win, environmentally. We have a pipeline to recycle plastic bottles, the mylar pouches are pretty much all single use.

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Bottle deposit systems are generally effective. In Sweden, 90-95% of the pet plastic in drink bottles makes it back to a factory to be used as raw material for new bottles. We don’t really recycle the hdpe lids or polyester labels, though.

        • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          That’s not actually a solution when talking single-use either. Remaking the bottles from recycled glass is incredibly energy intensive and not an environmentally friendly process either. Multi-use bottles are much better, but the cleaning required also isn’t that simple and also relatively energy intensive (far from remaking the bottles of course).

          There’s also practical downsides to glass (heavy, breakable), but those are subjective and their relevance highly depends on the use case.

          Ideally, we wouldn’t buy stuff to drink in any kind of bottle, but just use tap water. possibly just buy some concentrated stuff to then make your actual drink at home. Nothing beats the effectiveness of transporting water through a simple pipe, but that isn’t even possible everywhere in the world due to drinking water quality issues…

            • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              26
              ·
              4 months ago

              Good job with reading you did there. Your didn’t even make it 8 words in and already decided to comment. Maybe give it another go, if you dare, and try getting a little further this time.

          • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            A surprising number of companies actually do sell powder versions of their drinks on the web. I buy both Arizona tea and A&W root beer packets online.

            • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Holy shit I didn’t realize you could buy root beer concentrate, this is amazing. I’m totally stocking up next time I’m in the US.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            If micro plastics in the water supply is an actual issue long term the tap water will be shot for the whole of most places. Reverse osmosis systems are the only ones I had heard could reliably help, but I haven’t gone to extensive on looking into that. Each household may someday need under the sink or such systems if so : /. Unless we can reliably do so at treatment plants and then transport it through the lines without the water getting any back in. With many American cities having water at its current state, I don’t see that happening.

        • chingadera@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Well that would be because the god-king CEO would have like 45k less per year out of his 38,000,000 dollar salary without bonuses and stock value if we were to do that, you fuckin peasant idiot chump. Not only that but their enabling middle management might have as much as $200 less in their annual bonuses. Think for someone else other than yourself for once.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Our school won’t let us send reusable glass containers excuse of fear of breakage.

          I kinda understand, but our first grader has been using them for snacks at home for 5 years and never broken one.

      • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        When you say “we” as in you and me, yeah, I don’t think we could manage to recycle them. “We” as a planet certainly can and many countries do.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Recycling bin > recycling lorry > container > third world country > sea.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        …do you not believe bottles are recycled? Or is this just a snarky way of pointing out how ineffective the system is?

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Yes, actually. We should abandon the whole idea. We should actually stop using plastics for everything. That’s the correct take.

              Something like 9% of plastic gets recycled.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Great, you not only read my mind but you are also spreading gloom about an extremely well known issue. Beautiful.

            I don’t think I could have lived in society for the past 15 years without hearing about this issue at least 5 times a year, and I’m not sure what made you think otherwise.

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                So if I ask what a person means with their snark, it means I want the problem to be ignored?

                That’s a sad and weird way to assume shit, honestly. Because if you actually knew my view, you would know that I think about plastics fucking the human race every day of my life

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            If you even thought to say that, I can’t blame you for your original comment.

            Yeah, it’s really sad how bad plastic is currently destroying our environment. Humans have to be able to see further into the future than “will I live to see the consequences of my actions? Because if not, I can’t worry about them”

            • Melonpoly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              I agree,

              It pisses me off that you can slap a recycling logo on a plastic bottle and call it a day when the process is nearly impossible and hardy ever done.

  • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    4 months ago

    Oh no. I can’t relive the childhood frustration of being unable to access that sweet nectar shielded behind an impenetrable puncture-proof material with no tools to work with but the flimsiest of mini plastic straws.

    • Thelsim@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t know about over there, but here they’ve started selling them with paper straws. Making it even more impossible to puncture that stupid little hole while ruining the straw in the process.

      And of course it’s the only thing my daughter wants to drink. I’ve had to resort to using a nail file to open those things.

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I hate paper straws. There are many different compostable straws and paper is about the worst.

        • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s like a game now. Can you finish the entire pouch before the straw disintegrates? Stay tuned to find out.

    • son_named_bort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      They even made one of the ends of the straw pointy to give the false illusion that you can easily stick it in. Of course, all it did was puncture a hole so tiny that the straw (that had been bent several times already) couldn’t go in, so you just sucked the juice out of the package with your mouth.

  • paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I see a ton of comments here hating on nostalgic people, with no actual nostalgic people in sight yet.

    Personally I don’t care if a pouched drink exists or not, but if they are no longer producing pouched drinks they should probably retire the brand.

    Do you remember what a CapriSun tastes like? It’s somewhere between an extremely-artificially flavored “juice” concentrate and a “fruit flavored” drink like Kool-Aid. The whole appeal was the packaging.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is absolutely reeks of a bullshit “OMG the sky must be falling for you” condescending article from an older generation that thinks younger nostalgia is silly. I wouldn’t give this article any more credence than a boomer yelling “Avocado Toast!” at you when you’re enjoying a nice brunch. It’s just needlessly sensationalist shit stirring.

    • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s quite literally a bit of orange juice, filled up with water and loaded with sugar.

    • Nurgle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I see a ton of comments here hating on nostalgic people, with no actual nostalgic people in sight yet.

      …yeah you’re in a Lemmy comment section.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Plastic bottles in general should be illegal. It’s cans, glass bottles, or GTFO when it comes to beverages for me.

    • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      4 months ago

      FYI cans have a plastic liner to prevent acidic foods from dissolving the aluminium, so there’s still some plastic in it (much less then fully plastic bottles tho)

        • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s more that it’s heavier, so you have to transport a lot more weight for the same amount of product.

          Secondary to that, glass can’t be shaped as compactly as an aluminum can or plastic bottle, so it takes up more room for the same amount of product.

          There’s no perfect solution, which is why we have a lot of options.

            • MeThisGuy@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              I dunno. it takes a lot more heat to melt and recycle some glass that plastic. that and the transport weight is a whole lot of extra environmental cost.
              and the whole separating by color thing in the recycling bins. best bet is to reuse the bottles for the same beverage by rinsing them back at the original bottling plant but that is a logistics nightmare

              • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                it’s not a logistics nightmare, we used to do that until plastic gave us the idea of single use containers, many restaurants still do it with larger 1L bottles

                also, while yes glass does have a really high melting point, most plastics never get recycled and instead get burnt, releasing a lot of toxic chemicals in the air (and even if they weren’t, you can only recycle some types of plastics, and even if you did, new objects can be made only by some percentage of recycled plastic, and never 100%)

              • el_abuelo@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Aren’t they as equally unrecycleable as plastic?

                I can’t even put them in my recycling bin…which is where the glass and plastic goes.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ah, but without plastic bottles how would we generate additional profits from the excess waste of oil production?

    • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Glass has the best taste too, because it is almost totally chemically inert, you don’t get the odd flavor changes that you do with aluminum cans or plastic bottles.

  • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Good, the packages can’t even be recycled. Corporations should be held liable for their plastic waste contributions via the packaging.

    • paultimate14@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      You think the bottles are going to be any better? They’re going to end up in the ocean with all of the other plastic bottles from other drinks.

          • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Single serving things should be illegal, only things needs to be single serving is shit found in a hospital

            • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Single serving containers for food have their place, but there’s nothing that can’t be stored in either wax paper, aluminum, or glass(in that order). Aluminum is probably the best balance between recyclability and weight(fuel need to transport . You can even make aluminum “bottles” that fit in preexisting vending machines.

              • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                No, single serving bulkshit should be illegal. Other than convience there is 0 need.

                You could do the same with glass too, and as I’ve stated previously, aluminum needs a barrier, and normally is plastic

        • paultimate14@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Those bottles in the image look like plastic. I can’t find anything indicating they are using glass or stainless steel.

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        PET bottles are very easily recicled. In my country a sizeable amount of PET bottles sold are 100%recycled PET

        • paultimate14@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          But only a small fraction of the plastic gets recycled.

          If 9/10ths of the plastic ends up in a landfill or the Pacific garbage patch, having 1/10th of that plastic recycled into another bottle (which then will eventually have 9/10ths tossed in a landfill anyways) isn’t doing much. It’s better than not recycling at all, but it’s green washing to say that it’s “eco friendly”, which Capri-Sun allegedly did at this trade show.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Any plastic should be considered unrecyclable. At least pouches use less overall plastic then bottles.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      you only need to make them pay the price of each packaging every day until it biodegrades. you’ll see change very quickly.

      • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        They’ll spend 300millions in lawyer fees to find a loophole where they only need to pay one packet for the time it takes to burn.

  • PineRune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 months ago

    I very specifically remember the controversy 15-20 years ago when it was found that many of these pouches had mold in them, and you couldn’t see it because of the pouch or even taste it. I’m sure the quality control since then has improved, but any time I see a pouch of juice, I think about that mold incident.

    • VonCesaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      When they started doing the childrens semi-solid foods (applesauce) in similar packs, they had the exact same problem for YEARS

      The form factor sucks ass and I wish they’d find a better way for both types of product

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    I have always, for the entirety of their existence, hated those dumb pouches. Good riddance as far as I’m concerned.

    • spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      They made a really loud noise in the lunchroom if you inflated the pouch all the way, folded over the straw to seal it, then stomped on it really hard with your shoe. This was before mentally deranged people started shooting up schools though, so maybe don’t try it.

      • BigPotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Mentally deranged people have been shooting up schools since before Capri Sun was even invented…

        How old are you?

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m not going to look it up to verify, but I’m pretty sure Capri Sun existed before Columbine.

          • Mjpasta710@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Columbine was far from the first school shooting. According to the Washington Post:

            “The first recorded school shooting in the United States was in 1853 at a schoolhouse in Louisville, Kentucky. On November 2, 1853, Matt Ward shot and killed teacher William H.G. Butler with a pistol hidden in his coat pocket.”

            • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I think the very important point you’re missing is that schools did not exist in fear of school shootings before Columbine. There were no lockdown drills and crazy security measures for entering and leaving the building. So making a big loud noise would not make people instantly think someone was shooting up the school like it very well might today.

              • Mjpasta710@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                I’m not sure how I missed that from their first post. /s

                I get it, you’re scared. Noone was ever scared like that before.

                Edit: I looked it up, mocked a false statement and declaration of ignorance.

                Got downvoted. I’m not promoting violence, I’m mocking ignorance.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I know it’s not the first, I never claimed it was. But as someone who is old enough to remember what life was like before Columbine, that was the one that changed everything. That’s when we started having active shooter drills.

              Then 9/11 just amplified it.

              • Mjpasta710@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                It’s that I’ve been in schools with after school activities in the last year.

                Kids were popping chip bags and nobody drew weapons or jumped because of a loud pop that sounds nothing like a normal gunshot.

                I was in school before columbine ever happened.

                I don’t think violence in is ok in most situations. I think America has a mental health and gun issue.

                I like the Capri Sun mylar things from a nostalgic perspective.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 months ago

    In the United States, Kraft and its former parent company, the tobacco conglomerate Philip Morris Cos. (now Altria), have successfully marketed Capri Sun using strategies developed for selling cigarettes to children.[2] American parents often misidentify Capri Sun as healthy, and it is one of the most favorably rated brands among Generation Z Americans.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capri-Sun

    • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      The problem is right in the Wikipedia entry - its still way lower sugar than most competitors. So for an on-the-go drink, when the cup from home is dirty… Yeah its a healthier option than the others.

      It doesn’t make Capri Sun good, its just the others are so sugary that its one of the better options of readily available drinks.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Never knew anyone thought they were healthy. I mean I’m glad there is Vitamin C in orange Hi-C, but I know on the rare occasions I drink it that it is 10lbs of sugar in a 1lb cup

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Right? But this only applies to Capri Sun. If it were Hi-C, you’d demand a juice box.

    Also, the people who are currently in their childhood absolutely do not care. It’s just us 40+ curmudgeons that must drink Capri Sun from a pouch, Hi-C from a tiny box, and Sunny D straight from that wonky-shaped jug that won’t fit in the fridge door.

  • TwentySeven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    The article doesn’t actually say they are phasing out pouches, just that they are introducing bottles.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah thats fair.

      The outrage might even be a result of corporate marketing strategy.

      Maybe I should alakazam the post?

      • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Seems they updated the article title, which now says the exact opposite of your post title.

        Unsure if you can edit. Here’s the new title:

        Capri Sun promises they aren’t phasing out pouches after reports of a switch to bottles ruined childhoods everywhere

  • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t care about the nostalgia, but they are going to stop being easy to squeeze into a lunchbox now, so I’ll find a different brand.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Fine by me!..As long as whoever at Pepsi made the decision to only release Hard Mt Dew in “Zero sugar” versions is nowhere near it

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        That can’t be possible, glucose is required for fermentation to make the ethanol or it couldn’t be alcoholic. It’s the only reason college students could keep on weight where I was from.

        I wonder if it is all some marketing scheme where they are saying zero sugar because there is “no added sugar”. Basically making the non flavored malt alcohol, then flavoring it and adding artificial sweetener to get the sweetness.

        Otherwise if we could ferment and make alcohol without sugars, many people would start drinking 0 calories alcoholic beverages, as drinking 10 beers gives you about 1200 calories (bud light, miller light whatever shitty beers are around 120 calories a piece). Alcoholics would save 2lbs of weight gain a week there.

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s probably all marketing, anything branded “Zero sugar” still has that ass tasting sugar substitute aspartame in it

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah thinking back my sentence wasnt right anyways, doesn’t have to be glucose, could use fructose or sucrose, but they all have calories.

      • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        That annoyed me to no end. I have to wonder about the big push in artificial sweeteners recently; are they cheaper than corn syrup now? Are there enough people who are trying to cut back on sugar but also actually like the taste of dissolved copper in their drinks to keep soda profits high?

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Technically a shift from Mylar to PET might be more environmentally friendly, but yeah I would prefer cans or cardboard box drinks, you know: the ol waxed paperboard beverage carton

          • Soggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            No it’s not structurally “plastic” but it’s not biodegradable or reusable which is the point at hand so I think it was a reasonable comparison. (I also said “basically plastic” which clearly indicates similarity rather than equation)

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Absolutely plastic lined all, I was just trying to be descriptive since that packaging type doesn’t seem to have any unique identifying names.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I imagine it’s pretty much the same amount of plastic as they’ve always had.

      • Zier@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Bottles are 80% more plastic than pouches and cost more. The only good part is those pouches are not usually recyclable at all and sometimes bottles get recycled.

        • paultimate14@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          “Sometimes” feels a bit generous. From a quick search I can find estimates that 5-9% of all plastic is recycled. It might be higher or lower depending on the specific kinds of plastic these bottles use, but most of it is probably ending up in a landfill anyways.

          • Zier@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I was being generous. Aluminum, steel & glass are the only materials that get regularly recycled. All the others are usually trashed, even if you sent them to recycling.

      • nadram@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        The correct choice would have been paper/cardboard bottles, which is easier to recycle

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Juice boxes have a plastic lining, which is still better for the environment but not necessarily easier to recycle.