• cdf12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    166
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 个月前

    It’s worth watching the whole video, AOC is the type of politician that actually has a chance to have a party that represents the working class.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      91
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 个月前

      I hope the Democrats can figure out before the last minute that she’s a really viable candidate for President.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        73
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 个月前

        Most D’s are captured by most of the same corporations and oligarchs as the R’s. They will never allow a working class movement. Only corporate-whore lite.

        • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 个月前

          If so, they are in for hard wake-up call. Most corporations/oligarchs are rapidly shifting their allegiance to Trump. Those sweet donations will stop flowing to Dems.

          • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            2 个月前

            Perhaps this is one of the reasons why the Dems are also shifting right: to capture back corporate donors, instead of listening to the wants and needs of their base.

            Welcome to Democratic neoliberalism.

            • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 个月前

              Yes I think that’s possible, but it’s a strategy that will surely fail. They cannot very well pass the GOP on the right, and they cannot out-Trump Trump. The 2024 election has shown that there were insufficient moderate voters. The upcoming cycle will teach the Dems that there are now also insufficient moderate donors.

              Only chance to win is to go towards economic populism, and with Trumps billionaire cabinet it has never been easier.

        • aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          2 个月前

          this “not pure enough to be purely really absolutely 100% air quotes left left” talk Is what helped Trump get in office. but I suspect you know that

          • Deceptichum@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 个月前

            And the “You can’t mention the shortcomings of the Dems or else you want Trump” talk is what helped Kamala lose the office. but I suspect you know that

            • zbyte64@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 个月前

              But why talk about the failings of one person when we can concentrate on the more achievable goal of fixing stupid for half the population? /s

          • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 个月前

            Jaysus, liberals should just admit that they themselves benefit from growing wealth inequality as much as the right does. Who are the ones who keep voting down to build affordable housing in proudly blue states, especially California and New York? Why should the working class vote for a party that make empty promises and giving only breadcrumbs?

              • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 个月前

                Yup, total in denial. Liberal policies has been “we’re not our opponent” instead of addressing housing crisis and job offshoring.

                If the liberals goes further left than they are now, then they shouldn’t complain why the Trump phenomenon exist. It says a lot more on liberal policies than on people in general.

      • moon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 个月前

        They know she’s popular enough to win a general election one day, just as they knew Bernie was. But the moderate crowd would rather lose with one of their own than win with a progressive

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 个月前

          I mean AOC might become president, that isn’t gonna magically get progressive policies passed. You still need 218 US congressional districts to also elect progressives.

          Edit: And also 50 sentors

          • AngryMob@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 个月前

            Maybe. Republicans don’t have this issue though, it sorta remains to be seen for dems.

      • Elon_Musk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 个月前

        My micropenis submarine has already banned AOC from X.com because I saved drowning underaged malaysian soccer players from the pedos in the so-called british special forces.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 个月前

        No she’s not. She is a women and Americans well not vote for a woman for president. Sorry it is the truth and they have to stop doing that.

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 个月前

          Find me a woman who isn’t a center-right politician who has ever run. People didn’t vote for women because the women who ran are assholes

        • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 个月前

          Stop trying to play the gender card. We refuse to vote for a female president that legislates like a male neoliberal. They dont get preferential treatment because they are a woman.

      • sunbytes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 个月前

        Can private security be crowdfunded? /s

        A lot of others “losing” secret service protection is quite a clue to how the new regime expects violence and intimidation to be enacted.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        2 个月前

        Really? I mean she might be great but she is a women. America choose trump over a women. If the Dems run a women again then they deserve to loose again. They you and me might be fine with a women president but America is not.

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 个月前

      She’s in a tough spot because she dislikes a lot of what the Democratic party is doing and also refuses to even meet with lobbyists let alone take their money. To a ton of everyday people these are very good things but to either of the parties this is an enemy to the party that doesn’t have the firepower to win an election. Of course, I would absolutely love to be wrong on this but history (especially recently) is not on her side.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 个月前

        In the 2020 primary Bernie and Warren were regularly leading in donations. And in 2016 and 2024 Trump won despite raising less money throughout most of the campaign. Big money is not the be all and end all of politics, and when people believe in a candidate large sums can be raised.

    • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      2 个月前

      She’s is a fucking sheepdog, that’s all she is. Giving disenfranchised voters the illusion that if they stick around long enough, they too can have a seat at their table. She’s a snake in the grass that cannot be trusted.

      • AngryMob@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 个月前

        With this attitude you must trust absolutely 0 politicians i guess? Where do you go from there?

        • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 个月前

          I’m with you. I mean I agree with their sentiment and I think AOC is the same as the rest. She is after all a part of the machine.

          That said, it’s worth distinguishing the difference between trust and hope. I always hope.

            • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 个月前

              Your question would be directed at yourself and others like you. I’m not the one confused about which direction to go. My direction has never involved the duopoly.

              • AngryMob@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                30 天前

                No, it was directed at you for the sake of discussion, not confusion. But your holier than thou attitude prevents you from speaking with others properly.

                • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  30 天前

                  If I am viewed as holier than thou because I refuse to support the systems of oppression while also having to fight shitlibs defending it, then so be it.

      • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 个月前

        Why do you say that? Everything that I’ve heard her say has been principled and thoughtful. I haven’t read anything about her actions that I find problematic either.

        So… citation needed?

      • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 个月前

        Many citations needed. Or is all of that just your opinion provided without reasoning?

  • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 个月前

    Very true, but it’s not like Harris was signaling she was going to eliminate billionaires by seizing all of their wealth. So both parties are the same, right?