

OkCupid is a dead/dying site. It sounds like you specifically got off it just as it started its decline.
It’s probably not any worse than Tinder though. On account of match.com buying both…
OkCupid is a dead/dying site. It sounds like you specifically got off it just as it started its decline.
It’s probably not any worse than Tinder though. On account of match.com buying both…
That’s what a fed would say! And someone that’s not a fed would say!
Sometimes it be like that too
Well he will also have the Furies rip you apart just for the joy of feeling your skin tear and he’s on the same vibe level as Zeus in regards to consent but some people are into that too I guess.
Yeah this plan seems impractical and out of touch
I have no problem believing that every society has ludicrous cultural vestiges that can undoubtedly be traced back to a religious practice. For example, some Pope might declare that fish isn’t meat based on an example of linguistic sophistry to protect the fishing industry.
That’s because you had a bad take that illogically separates the biological demands of organisms and their communities from aspects of social organization
There is no separation, social behaviors are also adaptations to the environment.
Not hitting dumdums on the head with a hammer whenever they say something silly is a social construct.
Hitting dumdums on the head with a hammer when they do could also be a social construct.
The usefulness of either method might be disputed by some but that there is practical social and individual value in not being murdered for a bad take should be obvious.
The criticism of “that’s just a social construct” is not that it is one and is therefore meaningless, but that being a construct means it could be flawed.
Realtors. They’re surprisingly agile.
Your statements defeat their own purpose by acknowledging that it is a transformative process, which implies the use in describing phases of the process.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Death_of_the_Author
https://www.languagehumanities.org/what-is-an-intentional-fallacy.htm
Among other things, when interpreting a work even what the author says their intention was isn’t particularly relevant because they could, among many other things, be lying.
The HRE is just the HRE. People generally know you don’t mean Charlemagne’s version because that’s referred to as the Carolingian empire.
Plus that’s not how they referred to themselves so it sounds like you’re about to start talking about Aryanism next.
Same way they’ve always done
If the Democratic neocons are ready to come out of their closets we should be happy for them living their truth.
Because it is and all these others are heresy.
The shrunken Anglo-Saxon brain compensates for its lack of moral reasoning with a cunning investment into bootlicking and genocide /s
This isn’t fair, they’re doubtlessly just tut-tutting in vague disapproval of being so crude about it.
Sin signaling. It’s the seven virtues and sins.
Vices are what lead you to the deadly sins. Alcohol or gambling is a vice, but not sinful in itself, etc.
They’re well past vices.
Does make you stand out from the crowd if you’re not that though