This would be horrible for people who enjoy sideloading APKs.

  • Bluefruit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    May i recommend just buying a small form factor pc and hooking it up to your tv instead?

    Smart tvs and things like this suck anyways. Super slow and bloated with crap i dont need or want.

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I gave up on HTPCs after a decade or more of trying because I never found a good way to control it that was practical for everyone in the house. I ended up with a Roku Ultra (even though my feelings toward Roku are lukewarm) because it has a simple remote, or can be controlled/automated by home assistant, or can be controlled from Alexa (via a custom skill I wrote), or it can be screen casted to, or it could be controlled by a Harmony Hub (RIP Harmony).

      But separate smart box together with a dumb TV is the the way to go.

      • Transient Punk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        9 months ago

        I put Kodi on a raspberry pi, and my TV supported CEC, so I was able to use the TV remote to seamlessly control Kodi. It was as close to a native interface as I could wish for. And that was all the way back in 2016

        • ruckblack@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          CEC is such a nightmare of a technology though. I have problems with it constantly to the point where it’s just expected it won’t work 50% of the time, and it’s impossible to troubleshoot

          • jeanofthedead@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I have to unplug my docked Steamdeck anytime I want to watch any other input because screws with the CEC functionality so much. It’s a hot mess.

      • Terevos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Harmony was how I controlled my HTPCs. But once I moved from MythTV to Plex, I just started using Roku or Google TV frontends. They just worked so much more reliably and were super cheap.

        • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I tried to get the the HTPC working with Harmony. Even got a flirc to extend it’s capabilities, but never found a decent way to get good mouse control with it.

          • Terevos@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Oh I never tried using the mouse with Harmony. I’m not even sure I knew that was possible.

      • Bluefruit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Valid point, not everyone likes to use a mouse and keyboard for watching shows in the livingroom.

        My tv is “smart” but ive never setup any internet for it effectively making it dumb.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      Amazon’s lowest-end “smart” TV is $119. It’s really hard to compete with that. They aren’t making money on the hardware, they’re making it on the advertising.

      • kaitco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, but if you hook up a refurbished laptop that costs like $100, you could still use that via the HDMI rather than the Fire TV “part”.

        Take their cheap hardware and then not use what they hope you’ll use it for.

          • kaitco@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            It’s still cheaper than a “normal” TV + Roku or whatever.

            I mean, the goal here is to stop being so inundated with ads. There is a cost associated. The cost can be in a more expensive TV, privacy nightmares, or a cheap TV with a cheap setup.

            A $200 setup sounds ace to me and perfectly feasible. You could probably lower than by using a Raspberry Pi setup instead. A “decent” TV is going to run into the $400 range once you get 55” or larger, and your laptop/Pi setup can be used on any TV for as long as you want.

            Heck, it doesn’t even need to be a new-to-you laptop. I’ve repurposed my last 3 computers to do just this; I was buying a new desktop or laptop anyway, so the old one became my streaming device.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              You really expect some 60-year-old plumber who just wants to watch Netflix to figure all that out just to watch it?

              • kaitco@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                Idk…my mother’s in her 60s and she can figure out this stuff. And plumbers have a fair amount of general know-how. 🤷‍♀️

                Obviously, the TV-to-laptop option isn’t for the general masses, which is why these devices exist. I’m just offering that there are alternatives available to those who are willing.

      • Bluefruit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Im not familiar with issues like that. Ive been using my pc to stream things an watch tv shows without issue. I am using windows atm though so that may be why. Not sure if this is an issue on Linux or if you’re refering to a different OS.

        • SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          The main problem is most streaming services will only allow 1080p in browser, some even only allowing 1080p in Edge and will downgrade the resolution in other browsers. You basically have to use a smart TV app to get 4k… So you’re basically down to physical media or sailing the high seas if you want to be able to take full advantage of your TV.

          • Bluefruit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I supoose that is a drawback if you want to view content in 4k. 1080p still being the standard is good enough for me but i do see your point.

          • wax@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Netflix is 720p if running completely without widewine AFAIK. Netflix 4k needs a special hardware certification

    • XTornado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Waiting for the tutorial then… So my parents and grand parents can use it with a remote…

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Nah, sticking my GTV into my big ass cheap dumb TV I got on sale at a Fry’s while they were going out of business. Im even considering buying another big ass dumb TV soon from my local big box store.

      Pros: remote that functions with the TV, ability to side load forever (Google aint gonna kill android on their sticks), pretty much plug and play, is way cheaper than a small streaming box, works natively with my NAS library

      Never had an issue with it being slow other than Peacocks absolutely dog shit app, which also doesn’t work right on my phone so I’m guessing the issue isn’t the TV.

      Smartification devices rule on dumb TVs, Amazons has always been bottom tier one though

      • Bluefruit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I do understand the appeal but as a power user i just like having control. Last i used a fire stick it was slow and annoying to use but things may have changed since then.

        Me personally i find a pc for streaming and whatever else i wanna do just makes more sense but to each thier own.

    • lorez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I just hooked up my desktop PC which is on another floor to the TV, 30 mt HDMI cable, shielded. I control it via Unified Remote on my Android phone. It’s perfect.

  • BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    9 months ago

    the overkill that comes from running a full smartphone operating system on a product as simple as a smart display, has inspired Amazon to move to an in-house OS called “Vega.”

    The Linux-based, web-forward operating system would replace Android on Amazon’s TVs and rely on React Native to develop apps in Javascript

    So they’re trading Google’s locked down Linux distro for their own locked down Linux distro, but with JavaScript.

      • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        I mean, on some level it’s accurate, but only as accurate as saying any Linux distribution running a web browser with JavaScript-support is Linux but with JavaScript.

        Android apps in themselves are not based on JavaScript - some of them bundle a JavaScript runtime, but it’s by no means required.

        • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Wait, really? I thought android apps could be written in java and in fact alot of them are. I know that you can use c# and c++ or some others, (python?) but i thought navascript was the majority of the apps.

          Although i suppose it doesnt make your statement untrue, if java is not the only language but only the primary language then it wouldnt be accurate to call android linux with java.

          I would say though its likely that this statement would be more true several years back.

          • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Java has been the primary language for Android for much of its life.

            There’s an important distinction to be made here - Java and JavaScript are not the same, and in fact really have nothing to do with each other.

  • Tandybaum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Hey Amazon, I was a HUGE advocate for you. I help setup countless older family/friends devices for them. I told them that FireTVs were the devices to have.

    I have moved 100% to roku. The reason for this that you’re UI is ads 1st and apps 2nd. If you’re redesigning I beg and plead that you take a good look at what Roku is going right. You could do it better and fully whip them out (I hope not because competition is good).

    • jeanofthedead@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I’ve used an adblocker to block the ad that takes up 1/3 of the homescreen on Roku, but even then, it turns into a huge empty frame. ⍨

      Plus, Plex on Roku transcodes audio and subtitles no matter what I do. It’s so annoying.

    • digger@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m with you Tandy. The ads on Roku are very reasonable. The question is then, how long before it goes to sh*t?

      • Tandybaum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I acknowledge that these devices are subsidized by ads. However, roku shows you ads but they are off to the side and don’t impact the experience of using the device.

        FireTV devices are so aggressive with their ads and terrible UI that I’m fully off them (I actually still have 1).

  • wolre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Fire TV has been a horrible experience for a while and is only getting worse with them adding more and more apps. I have yet to use a Fire TV that is not a laggy piece of garbage. Honestly, whenever someone I know is looking for a TV I urge them to stay away from Fire TV at all costs.

    • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      bloat isn’t the only problem, this is my pi-hole’s statistics on the fire tv stick

      and keep in mind it clears the log every day, so this is about 4 hours of usage and 15 of “sleep”

  • ButtermilkBiscuit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    Tried this multiple ways over time and it’s a crap shoot. Started with mythTV box. Worked for a while but was clunky and remote was always a problem. Migrated to a dvr called moxie which was a early days dvr product from aaris. After moxie finally gave in and picked up a Tivo 4k setup and one mini 1080. Now days use plex server htpc and a pi with a couple chromecasts. Pros and cons with all. Nothing does everything perfectly.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    This sounds fishy. Very fishy. The Chrome team making another OS kind of fishy.

  • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Amazon has been using “forked” versions of Android

    and specifically by using AOSP to “fork” the OS to skip out on Google services and heavily customize the platform.

    Bullshit. “Android” is a certification for AOSP builds with some ridiculous requirements regarding Google Apps. It comes after the fact; vendors want this cert, because Play Store must be shipped with “Android”. Amazon just skipped the step, like most e-readers and other applications. And AOSP/Android is always heavily customized for the usecase ( esp. Samsung does heavily customize lower level stuff of Android).

      • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        They say, Amazon forked Android to skip out on Google, despite the base of everything Android (AOSP) – from which Amazon also builds their OS – being without “Google” to begin with.

        Btw, Amazon never used Android, the title is already wrong.

  • Troy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m pretty happy with my Nvidia Shield. Costs more, but works great.

  • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Welp. When my current Kindle Fire dies, I will not be replacing it if I can’t get Play Books and Nook Books on it as well.