• AdmiralShat@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      1 year ago

      Interestingly, the states rights debate is true, wholly.

      The north wanted to keep the right to acknowledge escaped slaves as free, and the south kept sending people up there to kidnap free men and women. They were even known to kidnap free born black people and sell them into slavery.

      The south also wanted to charge the north for this “service”.

      When people talk about states rights, remind them that the south was heavily infringing on the rights of the northern states.

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          1 year ago

          States joining the Confederacy were required to enshrine slavery in their constitutions. They didn’t have the right to reject it. If it had anything to do with states rights at all, it was about ensuring the states didn’t have the right to abolish slavery.

        • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess you’re one of those people who are incapable of reading between the lines.

          Or maybe you didn’t read my comment at all?

          • Liz@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Eh, sorry, it seemed like you were genuinely convinced that most people were concerned about legal issues. I’ve met people who tried to make earnest arguments like that.

      • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 year ago

        They also put it in their constitution that slavery could never be outlawed. Sounds like a really big issue for states rights

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Buy muh Southern Pride!”

      “What about the south are you proud of that involves the battle flag of the side that wanted to keep slavery?”

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The flag for a nation that lasted less than 5 years. Bill Clinton’s presidency was a longer piece of Southern heritage than that.

        • Xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          Cocomelon has lasted for over four times as long as the Confederacy

          They’re being beaten by mind-numbing nursery rhymes

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was proud of being a punker in 1988. That phase lasted longer than the Civil War.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve lived in Minnesota my whole life. Growing up, there was some religiously homeschooled dumb ass serving in the mn national guard who said that the Virginia battle flag was heritage. The last time I talked to him, I told him that the only heritage for us involving that flag is in the MN historical society archives.

        • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Damn, you found a Minnesotan who’s enough of a loser to want to give up the flag? I thought that was the one issue that united the Right and Left in that state.

  • guyrocket@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really? These clowns couldn’t take over the capitol building and now they think theyre going to take over the country? Honk your nose for me on your way our the door, k?

    • RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      1 year ago

      They actually believe that they can revolt, and with their AR-15s, magically take out National Guard troops and just acquire their weapons and armored vehicles.

      A member of my family is not only a veteran, but also fell into this lunacy and thinks his work as a logistics officer and his NG training puts him on the level of the Navy SEALs. And he’s almost 60. He salivates at the idea of fighting the mythical military oppression from the evil Demoncrats trying to take away his guns.

    • flossdaily@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem with all the slap-on-the-wrist sentences for the insurrectionists, and a totally free pass for Trump for inciting it… Is that they are emboldened to try again.

      The only lesson they learned from the insurrection is that next time they should bring all their guns. If people don’t understand that, they are nuts.

      They came within a hair of achieving their goal last time. Why wouldn’t they try again?

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        slap-on-the-wrist sentences for the insurrectionists,

        This is the largest group prosecution in the history of the US. Nothing else comes close. It’s a conveyor belt of justice sending losers to the federal pen.

        and a totally free pass for Trump for inciting it

        He was impeached for it and is now indicted for over 90 felonies. Dude will be under house arrest for the rest of his life. They’re unrelated but there’s a reason why lots of prosecutors are targeting him. Turns out the Justice Department doesn’t like it when you try to invade Congress. They took that shit seriously.

  • jaybone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No civil war. This time just let them go. They will quickly devolve into third world countries. And my federal tax dollars will no longer go to their bullshit.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is it. These people only respect power and hierarchy. Honestly most of the crazies will back down when they lose an election. January 6th was just the stupidest ones.

    • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re not gonna just go quietly.

      If they could just live their lives in peace without infringing on the rights and freedoms of others they wouldn’t need a civil war. They wouldn’t have needed the first civil war either.

    • Breezy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Noooooo. I live in Tennessee and that might be apart of the idiots! Id rather it be done and over with quickly so not to involve normal people.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I dunno, the south might give us a run for our money this time around. I mean, they have some of the most elite soldiers in the country, including but not limited to: the Gravy SEAL’s Meal Team Six, the Green Buffets, and the Roast Guard. Not to mention their many terror sleeper cells like the Yee-Hawdists, Y’all Qaeda and Vanilla ISIS.

    Scary thought to put our uniformed men and women against that crack fighting force, they might come back with some severe PTSD.

  • GreenMario@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Considering the avg republican has to ride the diabetes scooters at Walmart I think the 2nd civil war will be a goddamn turkey shoot.

    Let’s find out, Trumptards!

    • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not a Trumper and I know for a fact they not only have more gun owners in Republican voting areas, they also train with them more because it’s not as stigmatized. My point is that the Democrat areas will 100% lose any fight since we’ve been told for over two decades that guns are bad

      • SadSadSatellite@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They have louder gun owners. My friends and I don’t advertise our arsenals, and we practice plenty. My carry is hidden from everyone around me, because many people are uncomfortable around guns, and I don’t want to make anyone have to think about it. I am not unique, and I’m in a progressive area.

        • borkdd@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am aware of the gun ownership of one liberal person whom I know personally. I only found out because when they gave me a tour of their house, I noticed a small decorative item in their closet and asked about it. The item itself was a gift from their family member.

          Every Republican I know who owns a gun, OWNS SEVERAL GUNS VERY LOUDLY AND PROUDLY GOD BLESS AMERICA.

          • SadSadSatellite@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            People have asked, and I’ll tell them what I’ve got if they’re interested, but I’m not proclaiming it by any means. Most don’t know that I have made several different firearms and custom attachments. My core group is outwardly some of the most peaceful people you’ll meet, self aware, kind, pro mental health, pro acceptance of any marginalized group, but also understanding of the importance of defending ourselves from the encroaching wave of modern fascism.

        • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I promise you are in the minority of blue voting gun owners, and they outnumber you significantly to the point that it becomes trivial for them to oppress you (i.e. cops, military, and rural people mostly vote conservative and most own guns, and so they maintain the monopoly on violence).

          We literally will never stand a chance if push came to shove.

          • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Why do you think gun ownership will be the deciding factor in an all out war? Seems trivial to me. There are more guns then there are people to shoot them.

            Do you think Republicans are just going to go door to door genociding people?

            Do you think the US military will play zero role?

            You’re fucking insane.

            Do you not think arms dealers won’t be champing at the bit to deal to both sides?

            I can’t even do this…

            In your mind you must think the GOP is going to decend on a city populous and kill civilians by the millions with their ar-15s.

            This is just not how war’s are fought.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            Ελληνικά
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. We’ve had to tell these dipshits at least twice in my lifetime not to drink bleach in order to cure diseases.

            It takes a lot more that having guns and knowing how to shoot them in order to win a war. They lack the logistics, medical and technical skills required to effectively wage a war. Every time one of these dumbfucks tries to defeat “bullet-proof” glass with a nail gun, it really shows how fucking stupid they are.

      • Carlo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Democrats are not a homogeneous group. And they don’t have a monopoly on loathing Trump.

  • andyortlieb@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That sounds cool fun and easy but armed and untrained and undisciplined nut jobs crawling from the woodwork is not going to be a clean finish for anyone involved. Obviously this isn’t meant to be a deterrent for the justice system… but we’re working on a different tier here. It’s not going to be high profile business and agencies fighting each other. It’s going to be normal working people being attacked by deranged wing nuts and always by surprise, because there will be no centcom for them.

    So, if you think you’re going to be prepared for an outcome like this, I do wonder what you’re packing.

    • iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Dramatic and doomerpilled.

      The US military will aggressively dismantle any secessionist activity if it comes to blood. Hopefully we get to see some combined arms ops with the good tech for once instead of holding back.

      Meanwhile I’m gonna crack cold ones while I watch red states suffer from their own actions.

      • Flambo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The US military will aggressively dismantle any secessionist activity if it comes to blood.

        There will definitely be no mistakes they make that cost uninvolved citizens their lives. No matter what, the U.S. military will never be wielded against opponents of the ruling regime, nor in a way that serves the personal interests of those in power.

        Seriously, this is a bad outcome. This is a worse outcome. I’d rather have individuals crawling from the woodwork than the U.S. military being used against citizens.

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As someone outside the country, I think uncle sam will do just fine vs meal team 6.

      • BigDiction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s more about having an insurgency within the states. The measures to contain and crush that will make everyone suffer.

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          Ελληνικά
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nah, these morons aren’t smart or subtle enough to “go to ground” and make enduring sleeper cells. Remember, they Livestreamed their crimes on 1/06 and refused to wear masks to conceal their identities at the one time in history it wasn’t a massive red flag to do so.

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Once again as someone outside the country, you guys are due for getting knocked down a few pegs. Like what did you think the end result of this level of bipartisan bullshit would be if not civil war?

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Do you really think any of us (sane) people wanted this bullshit. Half of this has been spawned by the rich and the religious zelots. The other half by not cleaning up the last one properly. Seriously its not talked about too much but parts of the south became guerilla warzones after the civil war.

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      No it’s not. These fuck twits are about as inept as a guard in Metal Gear Solid. Throw em a few bones of disinformation, throw em in a bad scenario trapped, light em up. Rinse, wash, repeat. They will infight the fuck out of enough defeats.

      “Civil War” is just some fear mongering posturing. Nothing more.

  • Smacks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been seeing a few documentary style videos on YouTube talking about the uptick in far-right groups in the US. One guy was able to talk to a former group member, saying for the past year or-so they’ve been “preparing” for a civil war. Another member said they had people intentionally join the army to try and get people on the inside.

    Documentary bro tried to contact the FBI about it and was able to get in contact with an agent, but the FBI essentially said they wouldn’t do anything about it.

    Although I don’t think a civil war is going to happen anytime soon, it’s scary to think that the FBI doesn’t seem to care about any of this.

  • Ian@Cambio@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think anyone really “won” the civil war. We’re still feeling its effects to this day.

  • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “too”? Do they seriously think they’re the North side of the previous one?

    • fiah@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      who regularly waves the confederate flag? Trump fans or Trump haters? That side lost once and they’ll lose again