• missandry351@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    My camera has a cover 😂😂😂 I hope you like your screens pitch black because it’s the only thing you will see

      • Nfamwap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        All the laptops I have owned over the last 10 years have a mechanical shutter to cover the camera. None have been Dell.

          • Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            2 days ago

            I believe they, and pretty much everyone else here, thought you were talking about the mechanical shutter that you have to manually slide over the lens.

            • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              42
              ·
              2 days ago

              That’s not what mechanical means, but I can understand the confusion.

              Those are manual shutters. If it’s mechanical, unless you are using a very archaic definition or speaking in a different context it is capable of self movement in some form.

              Not that I’d be particularly surprised to find out product marketing on the question is all over the place.

              • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                22
                ·
                2 days ago

                Does your mechanical pencil advance its own lead? Does your mechanical keyboard type on itself?

                • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  28
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Yes, in this sense.

                  Clicking the mechanism converts the manual input to a mechanical or electrical output.

                  If you pushed the lead down entirely by hand it wouldn’t be a mechanical pencil, which is exactly why you pushing or flipping a plastic cover into place entirely with your own muscle power makes it a manual shutter.

                  When you type on a mechanical keyboard, what, precisely, do you think is happening? Are you literally outputting a letter by pressing your finger down? For that matter, what do you think a mechanical keyboard does?

                  Fucking Google it.

                  I do love having to explain basic terminology to a relatively well educated yet stupendously deaf audience.

                  Really restores my faith in humanity.

                  We’re not fucking cooked, and the mental infantilization of the population is not complete.

              • Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                16
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I’m a mechanical engineer, but what do I know. Just studied that shit for 5 years and worked as one for the past 13.

                But then again, I’m from Germany so maybe there is a language barrier between us somehow.

                We now know what you mean and you probably also know what the other person meant. All is well.

                • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  34
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mechanical

                  https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/manual

                  You’re welcome for the lesson on the finer semantic details of your secondary language.

                  Bonus terminology:

                  “Appeal to authority”: A logical fallacy in which it is claimed that a person’s expertise in a field is proof of a claim itself. This is a disputed fallacy, as there are indeed certain instances where it might applicable, such as a mechanical engineer describing the workings of mechanical systems, but is always a fallacy when they attempt to use their expertise in one field as proof in another.

                • ebolapie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  You used to be able to get a mecha for a five cents. Gimme a mecha for a nickel, we’d say. We didn’t have actual mecha (because of the war) so we used jam jar lids instead. Now one time Puddinhead, his name was Gerald Brown but everyone called him puddinhead because he had this hat that looked like a pudding cup. I don’t know where he found it. Maybe he made it, which, in retrospect, was really neat. We were a little too hard on old Puddinhead. Anyway…

  • SwizzleStick@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’d honeytrap this with a software camera that just plays filth and shock sites on a loop :)

    • boreengreen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The goal with software like windows is to eventualy take away all control. If you can run unaproved software, you can’t even join the teams call. Then you will see stuff like this.

      • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 days ago

        I own a small USB stick that acts as a camera. But in reality it’s just a HDMI input on the other end. Now beat that with software

      • SwizzleStick@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Years ago, I’d laugh at this.

        Yet it slowly becomes reality with every passing year. It’s bad enough that we’ve essentially lost pay-to-own in favour of subscription models for a lot of popular software.

        On our corp network, the amount of GPOs I’ve had to mangle together just to make Win11 usable is insane. The users are still going to have a fit in October.

  • YTG123@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fortunately, browsers have safeguards against this sort of thing (activating the camera without user interaction)

    …right?

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 days ago

      Zuck always has a piece of tape over his camera when you see his laptop. That’s all you need to know.

    • lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Both my work laptop and personal laptop have mechanical shutters that can only be opened by hand.

      They’re both Thinkpads.

    • Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Just last week we found a bug in our system in that if an user accepts a meet on pc while also having the phone app open, the meet is opened in both devices, - that alone could end very badly.

    • zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      In my experience people click accept without reading or thinking, and usually remember this setting which they may have already done previously.

      In any case all my cameras have physical blockers

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yknow one great thing that costs about 1.99 (one time cost)?

    Those little plastic slidy bits that cover up the laptop webcam and mic.

    • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s weird that people used to be concerened with covering their laptop camera, but people don’t care about their phone camera.

          • Carl@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            You can’t guess correctly someone’s shoe size and leg length using an accelerometer. There are factors that drastically change the results.

            • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Enough data over time I bet you could. Get a couple drop recordings, arm swing, common heights of beds/desks/chairs, you could find it.

              Would it be automated or easy? Hell no. But you can do it. We’ve discovered more with less

              • Carl@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Everyone’s bodies are all different in unique ways. Also some might have a limp, or crutches, prosthetics, different size feet, wider feet, extremely small feet(while being tall). There would never be enough data. Unless you were there in person measuring.

                • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Well, you have angle of tge thigh and speed and time between strides, giving us stride length assuming their phone is in their pocket, which would be easy to tell. Then you have foot on floor over time and speed, which would give you appoximate shoe length depending on their foot fall. But you could guess that based on axis bounce/force. You could probably guess their weight and gender too.

            • Dale'sDeadBug@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Samsung health can track some crazy metrics from just the Galaxy watch. I wouldn’t be surprised what else they can accurately estimate. Pic of the data from a recent run.

    • BennyInc@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      3 days ago

      You’d get a pious, stating that someone paid 1.99 to turn your camera an. For just 5.99 you can make sure it stays off.

      This could also be implemented as a bidding war like eBay.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s a fucking joke and so many of you are being smug with “not me!”