Gollum@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 6 days agoI would do this for just 1.99feddit.orgimagemessage-square126fedilinkarrow-up1690arrow-down117
arrow-up1673arrow-down1imageI would do this for just 1.99feddit.orgGollum@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 6 days agomessage-square126fedilink
minus-squareLostXOR@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up21·6 days agoJust wait until webcams start cryptographically signing image frames to ensure their authenticity.
minus-squareSjmarf@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up10·6 days agoPoint webcam at a screen, or maybe a white wall with a projector pointing at it
minus-squareBlooper@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 days agoJoke’s on you - I do this already. Porn and all
minus-squareAkatsuki Levi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·6 days agotape, and worst case scenario: a hammer
minus-squarebrbposting@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 days agoThink Canon tried that years ago with some SLRs - expecting that tech will be the only thing that proves anything someday. Wonder if it’s panning out.
minus-squareMutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·5 days ago Wonder if it’s panning out. Really depends on the lens.
Just wait until webcams start cryptographically signing image frames to ensure their authenticity.
Point webcam at a screen, or maybe a white wall with a projector pointing at it
Joke’s on you - I do this already. Porn and all
tape, and worst case scenario: a hammer
Think Canon tried that years ago with some SLRs - expecting that tech will be the only thing that proves anything someday. Wonder if it’s panning out.
Really depends on the lens.
Hehehe