• sygnius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yup. It was used to transfer photos from a camera to a phone back in the day when cameras didn’t have wireless transfer features.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      They’ve been around for a while. I used one with a 5D MkII several years ago. Horrible throughput. It was only useful for a quick transfer of a few images. Totally unsuitable for field dumps.

  • cynar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    1 month ago

    I had good luck with these at my wedding. Instead of disposable cameras, I put cheap digital cameras. It didn’t take long for guests to realise that the pictures were appearing on a large tv, in a sideshow. People got a lot more creative when they realised they would be seen quickly, not weeks later.

    I managed to get them working without proprietary software, too. The onboard script logged into WiFi and uploaded the photos over ftp.

    Given their size and the level of tech at the time, it was pretty impressive.

  • GlenRambo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 month ago

    I recently looked into them. They seem shit. Dodgey outdated apps to make them work and such.

    • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      Too bad it should be the simplest way to add wifi file transfer to a 3d printer

      • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’d rather just have an ethernet port on the damn printer. You shouldn’t have to cludge together basic network device functionality on devices that expensive

        • wizzor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          At least my 3d printer was so inexpensive it’s silly.

          I’m pretty happy that the engineering team that built it doesn’t need to worry about networking code and maintaining a networked device. Jappy that an open source community does it instead.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I like my simple one. I can do all kinds of hacky bullshit to make it do whatever I want. When you start introducing more things like Wi-Fi/ethernet you start getting locked in to their ecosystem. Which I guess is fine for a lot of people who don’t mind that but I can hook mine up to a laptop or pi if I want to add networking to it.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        If you’re interested and can get your hands on some kind of SBC (like a raspberry pi) Klipper has been amazing for my printer. You can also use pretty much any computer but it’ll be much less efficient energy wise.

        • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Does the printer need to be runing custom firmware for klipper or is it just on the external device? I have been running octoprint for a while now without much issue.

          • CoopaLoopa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Klipper requires that the printer is running Klipper firmware.

            OctoPrint can work with printers running Klipper or Marlin.

            Main advantage of Klipper is that it moves all the gcode and movement processing off of the microcontroller on your printers main board. Also, Klipper let’s you update firmware settings through a config file without actually having to reflash the printers firmware.

            OctoPrint works great as an easy add-on for a printer running the stock Marlin firmware. Main thing people want is wifi print uploads and camera monitoring anyway.

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I tried them with a few different cameras. They sucked. They wouldn’t reliably connect to Wi-Fi, and they didn’t reliably upload images.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s another reason why they’re kinda dead now. Closeted apps they have to maintain just to keep that garden walled, and it was a cost they decided they also didn’t want to spend.

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    I still have a 4gb Eye-Fi that use just as an SD card to shuttle files out to my laser cutter. I assume the wi-Fi would be horrendously slow and insecure if it worked at all. Was pretty cool when we still had a standalone P&S digital camera though.

  • papalonian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    Things like this would be so useful in the tinkering community, so many motherboards and such use micro SD cards or USB drives as a primary storage device. Before I gutted my 3d printer and put a computer inside it, I had to schlep the micro SD card back and forth from the printer to the computer room… being able to send it wireless would’ve been great. Looked into it at the time but as other have said all the current solutions are dog shit.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Things like this were huge back in the days of PDAs. They had SDIO ports specifically for expansion. I had one for Wifi and another for Bluetooth on my Garmin PDA, so I couldn’t use Bluetooth and Wifi at the same time, and both kept you from having non-volatile storage. If your battery died, your system was wiped because all the storage was in memory.

    I got a Dell at the very end of the PDA era (the iPhone was already out, but was still ATT exclusive) that was super fancy because it had a CF card slot AND an SDIO port, so I could store data AND use my SDIO digital camera.

    • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Was it the Axim x50? That was a fine looking PDA. I had an Axim x30 and loved it to death. Its death. Then, I got an IPAQ 210. They didn’t have any good accessories for that one. No clip on thumb keyboard or anything.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I don’t remember the model at all. I didn’t use it very long, as I ended up getting a Blackberry a few months later, and between it and my laptop I really didn’t need a PDA.

        I used the Garmin iQue m3 for years though, since I had it earlier and it had a pop-out GPS antenna that kept it useful as a navigation tool in the car well into the 2010s.

  • 4am@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The old Toshiba ones could run a WebDAV server on them and you could log in with a PC and upload files. Was pretty sweet in a flash cart.

  • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Still use mine in my cannon point and shoot. (Just as a storage device though) The software support has long ago suckified when “cloud” became all the rage, but it was awesome to sync camera <-> PC without messing with adapters or cables.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I had an early PDA (think it was an IPAQ, not to be confused with ipad) that had a 56k modem that connected via CF slot.

  • th3dogcow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I still use a 16 gb one for my DSLR. When I bought it about 7 years ago, I opted to get an older entry level canon which was basically better specced than the current (at the time) entry level model and far cheaper. The new model did have wifi though so I got one of these. Works pretty well. And other apps support them not only their included one (PhotoSync on iOS comes to mind). They are slow AF but get the job done.