• captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    As a woman who has been victim to sexual violence, I fear over punishment of rape because if their life can’t get worse there’s no incentive not to murder their victims. He got off too easily for certain, but the goals of Justice should be to protect the victim and ensure the perpetrators don’t do it again as well as to disincentivize those who may commit such crimes with the least amount of harm done to achieve this.

    One month sounds like far too little, but “your life is over” means even if they don’t kill their victim victims and police are both less likely to act on legitimate cases. Most rapes are from someone the victim knows and trusts.

    That said the team definitely should’ve chosen to not accept him on it.

    • friendlymessage@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      First of all, sorry this happened to you and thank you for your perspective on this.

      There’s a lot of possible middle ways between 13 months and life’s over, though. I’m a strong believer in rehabilitation but there are some necessities, e.g. a sufficient level of remorse which he has not shown as far as I can tell, and basically zero chance of repetition, which to be fair seemingly is the case.

      There are some things in my opinion that you should never be able to do as a convicted child rapist even after rehabilitation which includes being a primary care taker of children and representing your country at the Olympics.

      • Crikeste@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Thank you for pointing this out. As another who believes in rehabilitation, this whole situation made me really uncomfortable. I never wanted to defend the asshole, I just hate the way we view criminals on a large scale.

      • yamanii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        e.g. a sufficient level of remorse which he has not shown as far as I can tell, and basically zero chance of repetition, which to be fair seemingly is the case.

        It literally is the case: https://time.com/7004041/convicted-rapist-competing-olympics-steven-van-de-velde/

        But most people basically want the return of the death sentence without directly killing someone, they just want to take their living and put them under a bridge.

        • friendlymessage@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Is that remorse here in the room with us?

          Just to make clear what I mean:

          he said it’s the biggest mistake of his life - I sure fucking hope so. This is an empty statement, of course it is.

          and he has to bear the consequences - that’s what grinds my gears. No, he doesn’t bear the consequences, his victim does. I would like for him just once to acknowledge that there is an actual victim here and it’s not him. He destroyed her life. Even that carefully crafted PR statement you posted here only ominously mentioned “those involved”. He doesn’t mention her, his organization doesn’t mention her. He calls it a misstep and a mistake, he doesn’t call it what it is, child rape.

          If he were truly reformed, he would acknowledge what kind of pain his continuous presence in the public eye inflicts on his victim and others like her and would actually bear the consequences - step down on his own.

    • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.worldB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Thank you for a level response. In the U.S. especially there are fear and anger knees jerks to some situations where a calm response is an absolute necessity. As always, there is more nuance than there appears.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah one of the common ways victims are dismissed by the police is by asking “do you really want to ruin their life over this”. Now this man repeatedly engaged in statutory rape of an underage individual as I’ve heard, he definitely deserves to be punished more, but also even the guilty and unrepentant deserve a fair hand administering their punishment. But even if they didn’t, that’s the same hand that will punish the repentant and the falsely convicted. The three cannot be separated completely and so we must strive for what we can be comfortable with all three enduring

        • friendlymessage@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          “do you really want to ruin their life over this"

          The problem with this statement here is that the responsibility is shifted to the victim. The victim didn’t mess up the rapist’s life, the rapist did. But this is not an issue of too harsh sentences of rapists but of awful training of police officers.

          • catbum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            I think maybe it’s both? Too harsh of sentences (in some cases or jurisdictions) might contribute to a general police mindset which “conflates” the legal repercussions of rape with murder. This leads to or reinforces victim-shaming questions like, “do you really want to ruin their life over this?”

            The rule of law and law enforcement need to strike a better balance in both directions I think.