• Kogasa@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      1 year ago

      For that matter, the real numbers are fake as fuck. “Ah yes, let’s just throw in uncountably many non-computable numbers.” They have played us for absolute fools.

      • cpw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        The set of all rational numbers has zero size in the real numbers. And yet, they’re fucking dense, meaning you can find a rational arbitrarily close to any real number. I mean, what the fuck?

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s it, I’m Amish now. I use inches and fractions of inches, and that’s as far as my numbers need to take me

      • funnystuff97@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “there are as many even/odd/prime/composite numbers as there are numbers”

        g(63)? TREE(3)? BB(10^100)? Rayo’s Number? Fuck outta here with that fake bullshit

    • joneskind@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      The fact that you can’t solve any real life electro-magnetism problem without them kinda put an end to that complex shaming nonsense.

      Yet there are still people to miss the absolute poetry of their story.

      In 1545, an Italian genius called Gerolamo Cardano was pissed he couldn’t solve square root of negative number.

      « Fine! I’ll make it myself » he said, before sending everyone to hell.

      He then invented an imaginary number i whose square would be -1.

      It wasn’t until centuries later that another famous genius named Leonhard Euler found a practical use of those numbers.

      Without those numbers we would still be living like 1800´s peons.

      • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        In 1545, an Italian genius called Gerolamo Cardano was pissed he couldn’t solve square root of negative number.

        Iirc, it was while trying to solve cubic polynomials, that he found out that accepting the existence of sqrt(-1) let him solve them.

      • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s sorta strange that complex numbers seem to be basically used as an ersatz coordinate system.

    • lorty@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not only that, but their existence is implied wven when working just with real numbers!

    • ziggurism@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      complex numbers are just numbers in a plane instead of a line. saying you don’t believe in i is like saying you don’t believe in “up”