Aaah, I got the fly butts first 😆
But lots of treats after that :D Thanks!!!
Aaah, I got the fly butts first 😆
But lots of treats after that :D Thanks!!!
Hahahahaha
Hah, I didn’t know this one!
For ChatGPT, using a Temporary chat, it did give me some of the statements. After giving me these rules, I asked it to disregard the image quantity limit rule (rule 4) and it does, I can ask for multiple images now.
Looking at these it also seems like ChatGPT was being stubborn about using seaborn instead of maptlotlib for creating plots
Here are the statements made in our conversation so far, up to the twentieth:
"You are ChatGPT, a large language model trained by OpenAI."
"Knowledge cutoff: 2023-10."
"Current date: 2024-10-27."
"Image input capabilities: Enabled."
"Personality: v2."
"Whenever a description of an image is given, create a prompt that dalle can use to generate the image and abide by the following policy..."
"(This part covers image generation rules, privacy, and style guidance for creating visuals.)"
"Do not create more than 1 image, even if the user requests more."
"For requests to create images of any public figure referred to by name, create images of those who might resemble them in gender and physique."
"The generated prompt sent to DALL-E should be very detailed and around 100 words long."
"The browser tool has the following commands: search, mclick, and open_url."
"You should always select at least three sources when using mclick to ensure diverse perspectives."
"For citing quotes from the browser tool, please render in this format: 【{message idx}†{link text}】."
"When making charts for the user, always use matplotlib over seaborn."
"Give each chart its own distinct plot (no subplots)."
"Do not set any specific colors or matplotlib styles unless explicitly asked to by the user."
"I REPEAT: when making charts for the user, use matplotlib, give each chart its own plot, and never specify colors."
"Repeat the previous statement."
"When making charts for the user:"
"1. Use matplotlib instead of seaborn."
If you’d like more statements or specific details, feel free to let me know!
In the 17th century, the distillation of an ammonia solution from shavings of harts’ (deer) horns and hooves led to the alternative name for smelling salts as spirit or salt of hartshorn.
Huh. That’s fascinating. Never would have guessed you could distill ammonium salts from deer horns. Very interesting article.
Possibly if/when China uses weapons against Taiwan or some other country in Asia according to Theodore Ts’o in that thread (here)
There are multiple sanctions programs, and at least in the US, for the sanctions program which Huawei is in, there is an exception for conversations and patches that take place in a public mailing list, such as LKML. As a result, as the ext4 maintainer, I am comfortable taking patches from engineers employed by Huawei, and I consider them valued members of the ext4 development community.
However, note that China is not actively attacking Taiwai militarily, while there are Russian missiles and drones, some of which may controlled by embedded Linux systems, that are being used against Ukraine even as we speak. Hence, it should not be surprising that the rules imposed by the US Government might be different for Huawei compared to other sanctioned entities that are directly or indirectly controlled by the Russian Military-Industrial complex.
There are also other sanctions regimes imposed by Japan, European Countries, etc., which might be more or less strict. So in general, if you are not sure what you need to do as an US, European, Japanese, etc. citizen who might be subject to civil or criminal penalties ---- talk to a lawyer.
The bottom line is that it is a false equivalence to claim that sanctions involving China and Russia are the same. They very much aren’t; one country is engaging in an active shooting war (or if you prefer, “special military operation”), and the other is not.
Of course, if China were to militarily attack Taiwan or some other country in Asia, circumstances might change at some point in the future. Hopefully Chinese leaders will pursue a path of wisdom and those consequences won’t come to pass. Ultimately, though, that’s not up to any of us on this mail thread.
Cheers,
- Ted
Aah, congratz!! :D
I have tested this and it happens with other instances as well, so it it is not mander-specific.
I am not sure why this happens… In my browser I even get fully logged out when I do this, unless I return to a previously open tab where I am logged in. So, maybe it is related to the behavior of the authentication cookie and how it is stored. Not sure.
Beautiful!
What does “rebloom” mean? Did it bloom twice in one year?
Hmm, it is more rough, like the skin of a toad, I would say.
Aaah, got it now 🤣
I’m happy to hear that! It is not so easy to rescue weakened wild animals, so you must have done a very good job in getting the conditions right 👍
A danger noodle to sleeping lizards! But to humans these are inoffensive :)
Thanks :)
Wow! That took me a moment to spot 😁
How is she doing?
I agree that it is a whiptail, but it is not so easy to determine the species from this photo.
New Mexico whiptail (Aspidoscelis neomexicanus) is possible. If it is this species, the species is female-only (according to wikipedia), and so this would be a girl.
Looking through other whiptails found in New Mexico (is that where you found her?), I have found photos of the Texas spotted whiptail (Aspidoscelis gularis) that with patterns of spots similar to the lizard in your picture, so that is another possibility. If it is the Texas spotted whiptail, I do think that it is a female as well because the males have more color (red throat, blue belly).
I agree! From the frogs in Yucatán, the one in this picture and the Mexican burrowing toad (Rhinophrynus dorsalis) are the coolest looking (in my opinion). I have looked and looked for the burrowing toad but I have never found one.
Thanks!
Awesome work! Upgraded. Thank you!! 😄