The House speaker doesn’t want Republicans to be around when the deadline comes.

House Speaker Mike Johnson is conveniently sending Congress home the day before the Justice Department is supposed to release the Epstein files in full. The announcement came Wednesday night.

This looks like yet another instance of Johnson doing every little thing he can either to delay the release of the files or to make it so that his fellow GOPers don’t have to be in town to answer to their complicity in this monthslong campaign to avoid their release—as he did by egregiously delaying the swearing-in of Democratic Representative Adelita Grijalva for weeks.

“Like I said: view all political developments for the rest of the week in light of the fact that the Epstein Files are supposed to be released on Friday,” Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wrote Wednesday evening on X. “House Republicans just suddenly canceled Congressional session Friday and are sending everyone home Thursday evening.”

  • FatVegan@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    6 days ago

    I guess it’s the land of the free after all if you can fuck a bunch of children and still be president

      • orgrinrt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        This has to be a joke, right? But the .gov domains are reserved in us for actual government agencies, right? So what the fuck

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I am sure they have some good “rationale” for redacting what looks to be a significant portion of grand jury testimony. Of course the administration did say they would release them, but probably back tracked or they are “protecting” the victims.

          I personally think it is bullshit. They are handling it like top secret stuff. The President clearly has the authority to release this considering his current MO. It is a giant middle finger to the public.

          • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            or they are “protecting” the victims

            Yeah, sure, that’s likely, that they suddenly care about them now after all these years.

  • bampop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    Wow, I don’t know about you guys, but I’ve come to the end of my attention span. I guess there was never anything to see there after all, right?

  • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.mlBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    at this point, we need to form an alternative socialist government of the united states as a micronation. seriously!

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    242
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    This guy is a one-trick pony.

    Have to oath in a Democrat who will trigger a vote his master doesn’t like? Send everyone home!

    Files that incriminates his master are being released? Send everyone home!

    This tactic is getting old already.

      • Red_October@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Well the GOP loves to say that government doesn’t work, and surprise surprise when they’re in charge it’s the one thing they’re right about.

        • BranBucket@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s more than that even, they’re usually the reason why the government doesn’t work.

          Social security would work great if funded properly, so what do they do? Screw with the funding. The ACA would work if properly funded, so what do they do? Let the subsidies expire. Medicare for all would work if properly funded. The education system would work if properly funded. The VA works when properly funded. And so on, and so on, and so on. In most cases, all it takes is the money and resources that they’d rather steal or give to their donors and like magic, we’d have a functioning government again.

          They constantly sabotage programs that benefit tax payers while spinning the lie that government run programs can’t and don’t work. And after decades of dealing with underfunded programs run with minimal staffing and a maximum of red tape, of course people believe them.

          • Red_October@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            That’s my point though. If someone’s stated position is that a thing doesn’t work, putting them in charge of the thing is pretty much assured to make that thing not work.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      7 days ago

      Republicans complain that government is ineffective and corrupt, then they get elected and prove it.

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 days ago

      Members of your own party trying to force a vote to extend Obamacare subsidies? Send 'em home!

    • Draces@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      You forgot about his other trick: I haven’t heard about that or I haven’t had time to read that.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          7 days ago

          Pension for them is like 5 years or something absurd like that.

          A pension is available to members 62 years of age with 5 years of service; 50 years or older with 20 years of service; or 25 years of service at any age. A reduced pension is available depending upon which of several different age/service options is chosen. If Members leave Congress before reaching retirement age, they may leave their contributions behind and receive a deferred pension later.[1]

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            That’s actually a pretty standard public service pension schedule.

            Mine had me vesting in 5 years, but the contributions at that point aren’t high enough to mean much. It just means that if if I didn’t make it 5 years the city wouldn’t contribute to my retirement ( I put in 7 and the coty double-matches, so I get 21%). When I hit 5 years, I retroactively got the 14% from the city for my previous 5 years added to my pension. If I had quit before the 5 years, I’d have been given my 7% back as a cash payment after 5 years away from public service.

            But I can’t collect until I reach retirement age or have 20 years of service.