• givesomefucks@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      57
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There are no paragraphs…

      It’s a screenshot with a headline, subheading, a picture, and a picture description…

      Or did you find the article OP should have linked instead of this stupid screenshot?

      • Bronzie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is being pedantic, and then there is being a bloody cunt.

        Guess which camp you belong to…

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          27
          ·
          1 year ago

          Geez, imagine what you would have thought of me if I immediately jumped to personal insults…

          • Bronzie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The same as I do now probably.
            I don’t give people credit for being rude just because they avoid foul language.

            Let me rephrase my previous point: you were being a bloody cunt. Maybe you’re a great lad normally, but both your replies to the other guy were cunty.

            Try to be nicer to people. This is probably not the first time in your life a stranger has reacted to your behaviour.
            Do better.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              19
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t give people credit for being rude

              mate, I asked if they found the article OP should have linked instead of just a screenshot they saw on Reddit…

              Because that’s the only way they could have seen a sentence let alone a paragraph.

              If you think that’s rude enough to warrant personal insults, by all means just block me. I’m not getting into an internet slapfight over this, find someone else if that’s what you’re after

              • Bronzie@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                No I just wanted you to know I think you were being a cunt.

                Nothing more.

                Have a great weekend!

                • Promethiel@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I like your jib. If you ever see me being a right cunt, call me out. And I hope you have people around to call you a cunt when needed too. We need more of you, truly.

          • Cruxifux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Man there’s not much that annoys me more than someone being an asshole, and then being upset when people are assholes back to them.

      • nnullzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        … you are absolutely right. How dumb of me to call the picture description a paragraph.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          28
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, I was trying to be nicer than that…

          But yeah.

          While we’re at it, if you’re American and didn’t know this was a thing…

          At least you learned it today, because this is what Republicans talk about when they want to “return to the good ole days”. They want to make disagreeing with them illegal, even if it’s science that disagrees with them.

      • Spzi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It most probably refers to the text starting with “John” and ending with “(1925)”.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No you see it wasn’t religious because it didn’t require teaching anything else, just not teaching evolution. Also since some church folk support evolution and other church folk don’t it can’t be religious for that either.

      Seriously though, for anyone unfamiliar with Christian dogma, according to them humans were divinely made in God’s image. The state supreme court wasn’t even trying to be impartial.

  • havokdj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine imprisoning the people who are responsible for bringing new, functional adults to our society for the inane crime of teaching.

  • ColorcodedResistor@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    could you imagine having so much time on your hands that you debase the entire intellectual potential of your tribe, town, city, what have you, just by being a self righteous prick about pieces of paper with words printed on them?

    i was just in another thread. and for some reason. people take HUGE offense to being knowledgeable. like if you try to climb out of the ignorant bucket but you almost can’t because the other crabs pull us back down.

    you could rape a mans wife, flay his children before his eyes and he wouldn’t lift a finger to object, but say you have a book? and this book teaches you stuff? oh, that’s greater than any sin imaginable (the best part is i didn’t mention what book, but id love to hear everyone’s ‘self righteous’ projections about which one)

  • Spzi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    The comment section confuses me. Is this picture just a reminder how things were in 1925? Or is teaching evolution now banned in Florida?

    • YeetPics@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is an event from the past which is being echoed in the present.

      It’s strange, I know… sometimes people look at the past to better assess how to handle the present or to better know what to expect from the future.

      • Spzi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Alright, thanks for the answer. I found the snarky addition pretty unecessary. What’s up with people here? So much hostility around.

        I tried to understand the image and asked for help. Got it, thanked. Where’s the need for downvotes or sarcasm in that?

        Maybe that is living “A Boring Dystopia”, but I think we can and should do better.

        • YeetPics@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I mean at first glance I see a title for an article, a short description of the scope of the article and a picture from a past article that echoes the same concept.

          This article (I haven’t seen it linked) is likely about books being banned.

          What’s with the snarky replies? Well, you seem to be asking in bad faith and are being treated as such. I’m sorry if that’s in error. If you’re genuinely asking these questions it’s a safe assumption having it explained clearly might help you. If you can sense the “snark” you can certainly parse the topic of this article from the screenshot.

          • Spzi@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            you seem to be asking in bad faith and are being treated as such. I’m sorry if that’s in error.

            Yes, it was a genuine question. I hope this community isn’t always that way.

        • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it’s because you were mistaken for a concern troll, “just asking questions” but intended to not people down.

          From your first response, it wasn’t possible to tell if you genuinely wanted more information, or were gearing up for some bad faith arguments.

  • JasSmith@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    190
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Teachers were giving kids actual child pornography. Sorry, as a parent, I have a right to demand my children not be taught how to give gay blowjobs with graphic illustrations. You went too far, and now you have to stop. Cry all you want. Most people are not okay with your degeneracy.

    Edit: one of the books is called “Gender Queer,” and includes graphic illustrations of children having sex.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      87
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I’d like to see a source on that one. I find it hard to believe that all teachers were giving children child pornography and that’s what instigated this law.

      Doesn’t even pass the sniff test if you think about it for a few minutes.

      • yuun@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        republicans have the right to be furious about things that aren’t happening, it’s in the Constitution

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          38
          ·
          1 year ago

          about things that aren’t happening,

          They have their own facts. I get your joke, but boy It’s so depressing how crazy Republicans have become.

          • UristMcHolland@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            But but the litter boxes in schools all across the country?! We have to be furious! Right guys? These things are real and not just a complete fabrication, right?! Oh…

    • Razputinsgirth@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not for nothing but gay blow jobs are practically the same as straight ones and I don’t need a book to teach me that. Also heavy doubt that that is the case

    • shectabeni@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Prove your claim. What book? Where? Or are you just making this up or maybe repeating some bullshit some other moron said?

    • OwlPaste@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What an idiot gay blowjobs are the same as hetero blowjobs… also no source what so ever. I feel sorry for your children growing up with a cunt of a parent.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      if we’re randomly accusing people of being pedophiles without proof, I’d start with the guy bringing up CSAM unprovoked ya know

    • MrClayman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup, you got us! We definitely spend all day trying to get your kid to give gay blowjobs.

      I can’t even get these kids to wear deodorant without a parent complaining. You think we’re wasting our time teaching kids how to give a blowjob? Lmfao “You went too far.” Doing what? Did this even happen? Are you super duper sure? Did you check with the people you let think for you?

      Cry all you want, most people are not okay with your degeneracy.

    • Trekman10@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      None of the books being banned are pornographic. Don’t fucking lie to advance your cause of genocide

    • OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Does every banned book teach kids how to give “gay blowjobs?” Lie all you want. Most people are not okay with your bullshit.

    • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe next time try thinking a little more than not at all. What’s the name of the book? Oh you can’t tell me cuz there isnt one. You gobble up this political rhetoric without a second thought cuz thinking is hard.

      • uberkalden@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If there is a source, and I’d be shocked if there was, it’s a one off thing that should be dealt with as such. There was absolutely not plural “teachers” defiling our youth with porn in school. This whole thing is fear mongering to create an out group for conservatives to rally against

        • Enigma@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I understand that. It’s the same with the whole kidnapping bs that’s being spouted across social media right now.

    • DrPop@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That seems your source sound entirely made up to get a certain delight riled up. I’d you are a victim of this misinformation please do some deeper research. If you’re just a pusher of disinformation I’m really disappointed.