• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      She stuck her finger into the political winds way back in 2012 and came up supporting Hinduvista India, Qatar, and Donald Trump. Cynical? Duplicitous? Treasonous? All fair characterizations. But she started out a Democrat from a bright blue district and climbed all the way up the GOP colon into George Bush Jr’s old role as Intelligence Director. Seems like she figured something out.

      That 52 Republicans decided to throw their lot behind a Democrat from Hawaii with more foreign entanglements than anyone could count is mind-boggling. But that seems like a stupid fuck-up on everyone else’s head.

      Also gotta say… another person Joe Biden had four full fucking years to indict under the Espionage Act and decide to just ignore.

      • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Joe Biden’s mistake was appointing Meritless Gutless Garland. Biden isn’t to blame for any more than that. Garland is the man who should be remembering in infamy.

  • WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    holding a pro-Russia stance

    WTF?

    She’s a fucking Russian asset!

    When did The Guardian sell out? I missed that. They were pretty good as recently as the presidentoal campaign season, but they’ve apparently now joined the ranks of the compromised media who deliberately shift the narrative to take the fascist edges off of the Musk/Trump coup d’etat.

    • Zero22xx@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Edit: I was a bit mistaken. It was in fact the Observer that was sold by the Guardian group. Still seems like there’s smoke which indicates fire but I was not entirely correct here. See one of the replies to my comment for more information.

      Based on what I can find, The Guardian was actually sold to a company called Tortoise Media two months ago in December 2024. And according to Wikipedia:

      Guardian and Observer journalists voted to strike on 4 and 5 December 2024 in protest over a sale that they said would betray the commitment of the Scott Trust—owner of the Guardian Media Group—to the Observer.

      So not even the journalists wanted this company in control. And funnily enough, there was a Guardian article in 2018 that specifically mentioned Tortoise Media while talking about the “increased involvement of private wealth in the journalism industry” and how that is a bad thing. So from what I can tell, it can no longer be trusted.

      Wikipedia article on Tortoise Media here.

  • xyzzy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    The vote was 52 in favor and 48 against, with all Democrats and Republican senator Mitch McConnell opposing her nomination.

  • DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s worrying that this isn’t as high on Lemmy (or Reddit) as it should be. We all knew this was going to happen, but still, isn’t this more important than articles about Trump’s humiliation?

    I mean, I get it, there’s some serious schadenfreude there, but as with last time around, Trump’s clown antics are distracting from the serious damage that’s going on directly behind him.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      We all knew this was going to happen, but still, isn’t this more important than articles about Trump’s humiliation?

      It isn’t as fun or as sexy, so it doesn’t get the same number of Updoots.

      Trump’s clown antics are distracting from the serious damage that’s going on directly behind him.

      It’s only a distraction if you can do something about it. 52 Republicans put a Democrat with a snarl of ties to half a dozen foreign powers directly into the heart of the national intelligence service. Now you’ve read the headlines. You’re clued in. What’s your next move?

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Good! I LOVE America which is Why I’m HAPPY that someone our ENTIRE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, BOTH CURRENT AND FORMER, SAID IS A HUGE NATIONAL SECURITY RISK!

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hey, what’s it like working at the troll farm, knowing that large language models are all of two seconds from ending your job? Do you have any other prospects lined up?

          • libertyforever@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            So if you say something positive about let say Pelosi, then you have ties with Pelosi? What kind of logic is that?

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Do you think that maybe being pro-Assad and praising Russia for backing him might make her a poor choice for the role she’s been handed?

              • libertyforever@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Nope. She got 52 out of 53 Republican votes. If you only listen to left wing media, you probably won’t figure out why the Republicans don’t have issues with her gender and race.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  What does the number of votes have to do with her support of a ruthless dictator like Bashar Assad? All that proves is that Republicans are fine with her supporting a horrible ruthless dictator that tortured and murdered countless people. You can make this about her race and gender all you like, but all you’re doing is ignoring the quotes of her saying literal things and support of both him and Russia in that article. Not that I’m surprised that you’re ignoring her actual words that she said. It makes it much easier to defend her if you ignore them. Not honest, but easier.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Lol no it’s not, she’s did that to herself basically believing russian propaganda and aligning with it.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Turns out when you opportunistically betray your party and join the other side, you tend to alienate the party you were with before! Who knew?

      Have we finally solved the mystery of why people dislike former revolutionary war general Benedict Arnold?

      • libertyforever@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think the Democrats are actually racist and sexist, that is why they vote against Tulsi. Republicans have no problems voting for her.

            • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Counter argument? I’m not counter arguing I’m saying what you said is stupid. That’s all

                • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Your argument that the dems are racist and sexist because they don’t want someone with Russian ties to be in charge of one of the most important parts of government? Or is that not what you said.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Lol. I’m sure you’re playing those cards in good faith.

          It couldn’t have anything to do with her politics or the fact that she’s an opportunist with no principles who flipped to the right as soon as it was personally advantageous for her. Nope, every single Democrat, including those who are women, racial minorities, or female racial minorities, could only possibly dislike her because of racism and sexism 🙄

          God I hate Tulcels.

          • libertyforever@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            2 days ago

            She isn’t an opportunist. The Democrats pushed her into the Republicans. Trump have built a strong coalition with RKJ and Tulsi.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Lol, right. So when she was still calling herself a democrat and went on Fox News as far back as 2015 to shit talk Obama for not being hawkish enough in the Middle East, did the democrats “push her” to do that? How, exactly? Say it, that you think the democrats should’ve been more hawkish like Tulsi wanted.

              Oh, but you can’t, can you? Because she flip flopped into pretending to be an isolationist, as soon as it was convenient. And suckers like you eat it up hook, line, and sinker.

              Of course you’d also like RFK. If you buy into one insincere opportunist grifter who believes in nothing, why not another?