Seems aligned with the core values of this community that we should join the currently discussed movement to ban links to Twitter/X, including screenshots, on c/Antiwork

That platform’s owner (through purchase) essentially started the more recent wave of unprecedented layoffs in tech giving cover to others that quickly followed along blaming interest rates, but likely just seeing that investors were excited about it and using the cover. He failed to pay promised severance packages to former employees, publicly attacked them, provides notoriously poor and measurably dangerous work environments and is just generally hostile to labor. More than most communities, feels we have a strong mandate to have some clarity in our rejection of these actions, and this small movement has built around sending this message.

While there has been much discussion in recent days about the platform and actions of the person that bought and is in the process of fundamentally changing it (not to say it was perfect prior, but objectively declining since purchase), the platform has been a general point of contention online for a long time and for many reasons. Misinformation and hate speech are more prevalent than ever on that platform.

If no objections to discuss, we would establish the policy with a new community rule in the sidebar and of course, we can always evaluate positions like this in the future, should any meaningful change(s) occur.

Some are also banning the use of links/screens of Meta owned properties as well, something we can consider and discuss here. I’ll leave this thread pinned for about a week. Please share your thoughts if you have them and then a decision, and potential changes, will be made.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    137
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Blocking meta and Twitter links seems like a no brainer to me. If anyone wants that vile content they can use a search engine. I think screenshots are fine personally.

  • Modva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    10 months ago

    Fully support any actions we can take that reduces traffic and / or revenue to X.

  • khaleer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    10 months ago

    I am not even able to see content behind twitter link without owning an account, so they are usueless anyway.

  • prototype_g2@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    We should probably still allow links to archives/alternative front ends because screenshots of content can be forged. But yeah we should not give those sites more traffic and only link to archives/alternative front ends if necessary.

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      No. A Nazi site is not an appropriate news source. If a journalist only posts their news on Twitter, nobody should read their news and their story should fail to get out. Journalists should be forced by business pressures to post information on sites other than Twitter. We control the business pressures.

      • Adalast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        While I agree, it may not be about posting “news”. There is an argument to be made for keeping records of bad behavior so they aren’t forgotten or whitewashed later.

    • prunerye@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’d be nice if archives/front-ends were the default for everything. Redlib, Invidious, etc.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Politics and World bans all social media (Xitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, etc.) from top level posts, but it would be damned hard to police it in comments.

    You’d either have to read all the comments yourself or rely on user reports.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      10 months ago

      Or add an automod type bot to remove any posts containing those urls. Pretty simple imo.

      • booly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Enforcing against screenshots would be difficult, especially if screenshots of Bluesky/Mastodon are allowed but X/Threads isn’t.

  • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yeah, screenshots would be fine.

    For two years, I’ve never willingly followed a link to any of those places so it would be convenient for me.

  • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 months ago

    Ban links but allow screenshots. Sometimes there is a decent reason to show something from there. But it shouldn’t give them traffic.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    I consider links in general to be low quality posts unless the federation software can parse them in the feed like with images. Basically I don’t want to have to leave the fediverse to discuss a posting. That being said I find screenshots of social media to be bothersome even if its from some other federation community as its like hey I would be on that if I wanted to interact with it. That being said I will say what I always say. I want the software to put the power in my hands. The user. The lowest level. Preferably with a lighter touch at higher levels. So im on mbin and can’t block based on keyword. I would like to be able to do that. I can block source domains and I do do that. Screenshots are a real problem though as they sorta bypass a lot of that so I totally could see a rule that screenshots of other social media will be removed.