• dai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    dyne:bolic - specifically 1.4.1

    Had support for the original Xbox, a multimedia editing / streaming focussed OS. I’d never run it on mine - just messed with xdsl before going back to XBMC.

  • A7thStone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Meego, a combination of Intel’s Moblin and Nokia’s Maemo. It only ever shipped on one device, the Nokia N9.

    • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I much enjoyed it back in the day. Nokia even had their own app store for it and gave a nice financial incentive for the first hundred or thousand apps.

      I feel Jolla & SailfishOS is the spiritual successor.

    • Edgarallenpwn@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Bohdi is pretty nice. Needed a Linux test device at a job a few years ago and for some reason this was one of the only ones approved. Was pretty solid for the few times I needed to use it.

    • Luffy879@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Not really, at least in sites like gutefrage (german site where the biggest dumbasses of the world unite) There were a lot of questions about them trying to use it as their first Linux distro because they magically care about privacy

  • moonpiedumplings@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Maybe not some obscure ones, but here are some lesser known ones:

    Talos Linux. It’s an immutable operating system designed specifically to deploy kubernetes.

    OpenSuse Harvester Think Proxmox, but instead of VM’s and LXC containers, it’s VM’s and Kubernetes.

    XCP-NG is a RHEL based distro designed for managing Linux virtual machines using the xen hypervisor, as opposed to KVM. Think Proxmox, but RHEL and Xen (also no LXC). However, it does not come with a web ui out of the box, you have to deploy it yourself. Technically, XCP is a Xen distribution, since Xen is a kernel with nothing but a hypervisor that runs under the main distro, but the primary management virtual machine is RHEL based, and uses Linux.

    Speaking of Proxmox, Proxmox is technically a Linux distro.

    SnowflakeOS is a project that aims to bring a GUI focused experience to NixOS.

    TurnkeyLinux (site is loading very, very slowly for me right now) is not a single distribution, but rather a set of debian based distributions that are designed to be turnkey appliance virtual machines that contain and host a specific app. To deploy the app, all you have to do is set up the virtual machine.

    Now, here are some not-linux, but interesting distros:

    SmartOS. They ported KVM to unix, and also can use Linux syscall translation (similar to wine) to run apps in containers as well. There is also Bhyve. It’s a very interesting hypervisor platform.

    OmniOS is similar. Bhyve, KVM, and Linux syscall translation in containers.

  • greedytacothief@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Sabayon Linux. I’m not sure if it’s still releasing updates, the main website is dead. It was based on Gentoo and later funtoo, but had a package manager of precompiled binaries. You could still use emerge if you wanted to. Definitely a weird and interesting distro

    Blend OS is trying to do the declarative nixos thing but with an arch base. That’s pretty cool.

    ClearOS was Intel’s attempt at an immutable os. From what I remember it was really fast.

    Edit: actually it clear Linux not clearOS. Edit: also clear Linux is stateless. I don’t know, there’s a lot about it I don’t understand

    • TootSweet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Oh jeez. I forgot about that. I had that running on my DS back in the day from a GBA flashcart with a big-ass CompactFlash card sticking out the bottom. Good times.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Rebecca Black OS.
    It is the only Linux distro to date built around Weston, using Wayland’s full capability:

    It doesn’t include any Rebecca Black theming or is related to her in any way.
    It’s just called that cause the dev is a fan of hers.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    There was this distro that stuffs everything of a package in one folder, instead of /usr/lib & co. What was it called again?

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Wait… they’re militant enough about Free Software to refuse to package anything even slightly non-Free, but their “final goal” is to switch the kernel to BSD (i.e. away from copyleft)? WTF?

      • cqst@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        but their “final goal” is to switch the kernel to BSD (i.e. away from copyleft)?

        HyperbolaBSD is a hard fork, that relicenses the OpenBSD kernel as GPL (as permitted by permissive licenses.) HyperbolaBSD has already dug into the OpenBSD source tree and discovered numerous licensing issues. https://git.hyperbola.info:50100/~team/documentation/todo.git/tree/openbsd_kernel-file-list-with-license-issues.md

        HyperbolaBSD will be a truly libre distro that takes advantage of copyleft, while moving away from the major issues Linux is stepping into too.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Ah, that’s different then!

          Hmm…

          From https://wiki.hyperbola.info/doku.php?id=en%3Amanual%3Acontrib%3Ahyperbolabsd_faq:

          HyperbolaBSD is under a progressive migration by replacing all non GPL-compatible code. It will be replaced with new compatible code under Simplified BSD License. We do this in order to incorporate GPL code from other projects such as ReactOS, as well new code from scratch.

          It’s not clear to me that relicensing the existing code to GPL is what they’re planning on doing; it sounds more like they’re going to mix in GPL code but not change the existing files to GPL en masse after they finish harmonizing them to two-clause BSD.

          Frankly, IMO that’s too bad: I’d love to see them make the whole shebang GPLv3-or-later


          Related question: is all Linux kernel code required to be licensed GPLv2-only, or are individual contributions allowed to be GPLv2-or-later? I’d be nice to see if that project (and stuff like HURD and ReactOS) could benefit from at least some Linux contributions, even if they can’t copy it wholesale.

      • servobobo@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s an ancient divide in parts of the FOSS community that believes copyleft licenses are not “free” because they force you to license contributions under the same license.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Yeah, I know, but I would’ve expected a distro that describes itself as “GNU/Linux-libre” would fall on the other side of it!

        • cqst@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          No one thinks this. Even permissively licensed BSD operating systems package GPL software and accept it as Free Software.

    • Vivendi@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Certain things? Fucking luddite idiots don’t package 99.9% of software.

      AIX Unix from the 1980s is literally more useful than that heap of garbage

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Why so much rage?

        Yes, Hyperbola is very ideological and super strict, but it was always meant to be that way - to provide a system that works in some way and at the same time is as ethical and “clean” as possible. Some people value it over anything, and for them, Hyperbola is a good pick.

    • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      was that translated into english from another language?

      I love how they blended FAQ with meth-induced psychosis rambling.

      I’ve gotta give them kudos for sticking to their very strict values, but holy hell is this hard to parse

  • davidgro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Limiting to those I have used daily and treated as Linux (used the terminal for example) probably Maemo. I used to carry my Nokia Internet Tablet 770, and then my N800 everywhere with me.

    Maemo is also an ancestor of both Tizen and Sailfish OS

    • A7thStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      My first smart phone was a Nokia N9. I loved Meego which was between Maemo and sailfish. I hatred Microsoft before that, but them killing Nokia made my hate burn even brighter.