(ignore the old TV)

an ESPN+ exclusive fight has literally nothing to do with the football

  • Gingerlegs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    125
    ·
    2 months ago

    I hate to be the guy to tell you, man. But, they’ve been doing this shit for like, 30 years man.

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    2 months ago

    I can’t ignore the old TV.

    I’m honestly impressed there are still functional, floor-model rear-projection TVs.

    • Rebels_Droppin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 months ago

      I clean out houses for a living, you’d be very shocked how many functional rear projection and CRTs are in use and get thrown out “because old”.

    • Hubi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s too heavy to ever get replaced. It’ll still be there after the house is long gone.

  • joenforcer@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is a weird take. That ticker telling you about scores and schedules for a whole bunch of different sports has been on ESPN forever.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      While I understand their point, it’s like going to the channel with the stock market banner on the bottom and complaining it is taking up part of the screen, where I would almost say the other 90% of the screen is the ads.

      So many hours spent watching that as a child. It was either that channel or Bob Barker when I was on summer break

        • ivanafterall ☑️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I thought sports was about wealthy, unscrupulous white men fighting each other over the right to have the most-talented black men go to work in their fields.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nah, that is to keep potential clients interested.

        They keep adding rules to the sport to make it more “TV viewing friendly”, meaning more breaks to show ads. I mean, the superbowl is just ads with sport attached.

        • mhague@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Look at the sports with systemic ad presence vs sports where it’s all “grass roots.” (The grass roots ones are mostly gone.)

          Most top sports are incredibly expensive to keep running and the ones that become infested with ads are the ones that stick around for us to enjoy. If you follow less popular sports you’ll consider yourself lucky to bring in ads and sponsors.

  • qwestjest78@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    Honestly I would take the little banner if it meant there was not comerical breaks. The fact that they do this on top of all the ads they also play at breaks is so over the top. I have been getting into European football and I find it so refreshing that they play 45 mins half straight through. It’s way faster games and there is not the disruption of comericals. In those games they have the banner, but I don’t mind it as much

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I actually struggled to identify what part of the screen was an ad, and I’m less able to be outraged about a TV channel displaying what content they will be broadcasting later than ads for unrelated products. Similar to how I’m okay with or even want to see movie previews before a movie, but I better not see a commercial for insurance or consumer electronics.

  • TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s fucking irritating.

    I love your tv tho and cant ignore it. My dad had one of these beasts when I was young it had to be over 300 pounds easy. Thing never moved once it was there.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s actually called a “bug”—not the software error kind, though. In sports broadcasts, we get the classic “score bug,” always been there, usually small and tucked in a corner to keep things low-key. But what you’re seeing here, this whole bottom-of-the-screen takeover, is way more like those old-school news channel bugs from back in the ‘90s or early 2000s. You know, the ones that would stretch across the screen with stock prices, news updates, whatever they wanted to throw at you, right underneath the main action. It’s more intrusive for sure, but not anything wild—it’s actually been around for decades.

    • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I thought the strip across the bottom was called a chyron? Not heard it referred to as a bug before (not saying you’re wrong though).

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Maybe in news it is. 🤷‍♂️ My knowledge comes from working with a 3rd party for ESPN. I know ESPN refers to this as the bug. There are “bug operators”, and boy howdy does the producer yell at them when they’re not on their toes.