Here we go, the first Presidential debate between Biden and Trump begins at 9 PM Eastern/6 PM Pacific.

How to watch it:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/25/politics/how-to-watch-cnn-debate/index.html

"The CNN Presidential Debate will air live on CNN, CNN International and CNN en Español, and via streaming on Max for subscribers and without a cable login on CNN.com. CNN will make the debate available to simulcast on additional broadcast and cable news networks.

You can also follow CNN’s live debate coverage on CNN.com, which will include analysis and fact checking."

"According to parameters set by CNN in May, all participating debaters had to appear on a sufficient number of state ballots to reach the 270 electoral vote threshold to win the presidency and receive at least 15% in four separate national polls of registered or likely voters that meet CNN’s standards for reporting.

Polls that meet those standards are those sponsored by CNN, ABC News, CBS News, Fox News, Marquette University Law School, Monmouth University, NBC News, The New York Times/Siena College, NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist College, Quinnipiac University, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post."

Edit And that’s it! Thanks for watching everyone!

tl;dw:

Consensus is Trump didn’t so much as beat Biden as Biden beat himself.

The real loser is CNN who failed to fact check anyone, and there were obvious fact checks on both sides.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’m going to vote for policy, not a person. I don’t agree with Trump on anything, so I’ll vote for Biden.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This country is cooked with these two as the choices. Biden looked awful, and Trump didn’t answer anything at all. Trump gets a pass on never having any substance to his replies. It is just jokes and insults.

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    132
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Oh. My. God.

    It’s literally two old-as-fuck fucks arguing about their golf swings. This is literally how the debate is coming to a close. I just… I don’t even know what to say.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    The moderators should be ashamed of themselves.

    Trump hasn’t answered a single question in 20 mins.

    “I just wanna go back to that.”

    They are allowing gish galloping like a motherfucker and Biden has to defend himself from a thousand lies AND answer the question asked while Trump spews bullshit unending.

    • jeffw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not a single fact check. It’s not that hard to state when something is inaccurate and challenge the speaker

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The LWV (League of Woman Voters) sponsored the United States presidential debates in 1976, 1980 and 1984.[75][76] On October 2, 1988, the LWV’s 14 trustees voted unanimously to pull out of the debates, and on October 3 they issued a press release condemning the demands of the major candidates’ campaigns. LWV President Nancy Neuman said that the debate format would “perpetrate a fraud on the American voter” and that the organization did not intend to “become an accessory to the hoodwinking of the American public.”[77][78] All presidential debates since 1988 have been sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates,[79] a bipartisan organization run by the two major parties that some argue has established rules with the intent to exclude airing candidates associated with other parties.[80]

      Source

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yes, they should have been fact checking Trump or better holding him to his answers - but to be fair maybe they should have been asking Biden to actually clarify if he’s beating Medicare or getting COVID passed.

      This was a shit show.

      And it was such a shit show that Trump was a complete clown and getting away with it - not just because of the moderators, but because his opponent was as on point as a tree stump.

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oof, yes, we need opponents for this guy who understand the fundamentals of how he and his rhetoric work. The better way to deal with him is to flip the frame. Specifically, in the opening statement, Biden needed to call out very explicitly that Trump was going to lie constantly, and furthermore, point out that you can recognize his lies when he says “best, strongest, biggest, greatest.” That little bit of verbal jiu jitsu would’ve ensured that it was no longer Biden calling out the lies, but the viewers’ own ears, and by bringing them to conscious attention, draining the power of those statements. (Trump spews lies and nonsense that don’t parse analytically, like that alphabet-soup closing statement, but he’s really aiming his words at the subconscious mind.)

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      The moderators should be ashamed of themselves.

      Why? They accomplished what they were there to do.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I seriously doubt it but I really hope this is a wake-up call for Democrats. I remain convinced that Biden voluntarily stepping down and permitting a younger more charismatic figure in his place will be all that is needed to win, and I say this for a few reasons:

    • By the polling, age is a huge issue for a significant majority of Americans, with it clearly harming Biden more.
    • Any youthful semi-in-the-shadows candidate will be fresh for Americans, who will be excited for anything different.
    • The right-wing talking-points won’t be pre-written.
    • By Biden & Democrats getting ahead of this and saying, “look we recognize the electorate’s concerns and what’s at stake and we know the people by large majorities don’t want either President, so we’re responding,” they would get major points.

    Call it a reverse-October surprise.

    That being said, this is the earliest debate ever and Trump still needs to go through sentencing in July. People won’t really remember this debate, but it certainly did not help Biden in any capacity.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Jon Stewart was kind of brutal:

    “Lots of people have ‘resting 25th amendment face.’”

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The elimination of the First Past the Post voting system would allow voters to support third-party candidates without the fear of causing a spoiler effect. This change would promote greater competition in elections, improving the caliber of candidates available to all voters. Also, it is likely to boost voter turnout and increase political engagement.

    Electoral reform has already been achieved at the state level; Alaska and Maine have successfully implemented changes to their electoral systems, demonstrating that broader reform is feasible.

    However, Republicans have taken steps to preserve the First Past the Post voting system. For instance, Florida recently outlawed Ranked Choice voting. Despite this setback, there are numerous alternatives to First Past the Post, ensuring that bans like Florida’s do not obstruct progress toward electoral reform.

    This raises the question: why do predominantly Democratic states continue to utilize First Past the Post voting? Why continueto use a voting system favored by Republicans? In states controlled by Democrats, there are no Republican obstacles preventing these reforms.

    It is evident that Democrats recognize the shortcomings of First Past the Post voting. Mentioning third-party voting on social media often prompts numerous Democrats to caution against “wasting” votes that could inadvertently benefit Republicans. It is perplexing to acknowledge flaws in the voting system yet fail to take action to address them. Lecturing others about the drawbacks of First Past the Post voting while neglecting to pursue solutions is contradictory and counterproductive.

    Here are some videos on the topic if you’d like to know more:

    First Past The Post voting

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo

    Other electoral systems to choose from:

    Alternative vote

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Y3jE3B8HsE

    Ranked Choice voting

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Z2fRPRkWvY

    Range Voting

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3GFG0sXIig

    Single Transferable Vote

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8XOZJkozfI

    STAR voting

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-mOeUXAkV0

    Mixed Member Proportional representation

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QT0I-sdoSXU

  • mkhopper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    What the fuck are the moderators even there for?

    So much time is being taken with, “let me keep talking about the question from ten minutes ago and ignore what you just asked.”

    Sorry people with children. The question that focused on your issues were just skipped over.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Let’s be honest, fact-checking doesn’t matter to the American people watching this. The people who need to hear these facts have already been preprogrammed to believe CNN is biased and lying.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 days ago

        It is about not forcing Biden to spend half of each response regarding to blatant lies like… Biden being pro Palestine.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          “Well, we can’t let Republicans say we’re pro-Palestine! Guess we get to gotta support Netanyahu even harder!”

      • Dragomus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Trump demanded the debate, Biden should have demanded thorough fact checks with graphs and balances.

        I personally would not have stepped in any debate setting with a certified liar and scammer without any sort of fact checking, it’s just foolishness.

  • MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why do we only get 90 minutes. Why do they only get 1 minute to answer. Sit the down and have an actual discussion damnit. You’re trying to run a country not win a talent show. I want hear how their brains work, not their mouths.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    We live in a world where Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Camacho is more electable than the candidates we have.

    I figured Idiocracy was prescient, but it’s coming true awfully fast.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    3 days ago

    Trump is playing pigeon chess. Strutting around, telling lies, shitting all over everything, and will leave telling everyone he won.

    No policy debate. Zero.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Listening to more of the analysis and clips from the debate, Biden’s performance reminded me of high school and college presentations where students over-prepared by following a very rigid, memorized script but derail because they forget a single key word or trigger. This isn’t a very robust presentation strategy that can easily fail even with younger minds, let alone someone in their 80s.