• jeffw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I assume that they are a white conservative who has never talked with a Black person or they don’t know anything about US Black culture. In reality, menthols are super popular among Black smokers. I assume they think it’s a racial stereotype instead of reality.

      • ditty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 months ago

        Totally! Here’s a quote right from the article:

        “An estimated 85 percent of Black smokers use menthol cigarettes, according to federal statistics.”

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I mean why ban JUST menthol cigarettes. Yes they’re not good for you. No cigarettes are. It seemed to be an odd move unless they are somehow out and away much worse. That and yes. Bans are often useless. Money would be better spent addressing the factors that make people want to smoke and provide better alternatives. It’d be cheaper and more effective. I think the only down side to it is a threat to corporate profits. Which is a good downside to have if you ask me.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Because they’re the only legal non tobacco flavoring left. The idea is that flavored tobacco encourages smoking. I disagree regarding menthol, but I see it and I’m open to being swayed by data.

            • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Is there a “predominantly white” flavor of cigarette? Can you explain how you would take steps to ban cigarettes, without “targeting minorities” and without an immediate outright ban?

              • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                I wouldn’t take steps to ban cigarettes. Prohibition never stops people from doing what they want to do, usually makes things worse, and usually disproportionally affects minorities.

                  • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Stay the course. Smoking is trending down. Continue educational programs so everyone knows the risks, but ultimately leave it up to adults to make their own decisions.

                • ripcord@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  And yet, overall. Smoking reduction efforts in the US have been pretty effective.

        • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          Because they’re worse than regular cigarettes for multiple reasons. You tend to inhale longer and more deeply which is worse for your lungs, you might even smoke more since you don’t feel the smoke and they don’t really fix the whole craving, they were at least in the EU also more popular among young kids and generally more addicting.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’m no expert. My natural reaction is those arguments sound specious. But not out of the question. Do you have a link to something solid. Reporting/research to share on this. Would be interesting if true. Like I said I’m not an expert. Not even a smoker. Had no one in my immediate family has smoked since the mid-1980s. So I have little doubt there are gaps in my knowledge.

            • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              You can fairly easily find several studies if you look up the EU ban in your favored search engine.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Weird and kinda funny. Where I live, before they got banned, they were rather stereotyped with “weaker men”, effeminate men, old snobby ladies, etc. but they also had a strong tendency to be popular with kids, since you don’t really feel the smoke you inhale. Personally I always felt like this was a downside when I was still smoking, because it was like you’re just inhaling air, which didn’t actually satisfy my need for a cigarette.

        Edit: Could the downvoters clarify what about my anecdote is worth downvoting?

        • cmbabul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s how I felt about menthols when I was a smoker. When they were first introduced I believe those were the ‘demographics’ they targeted, but the shifted to pushing on black folks in like the 60s if I remember correctly

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Not every Black person likes menthol, and lots of people of different ethnicities smoke the hell out of them.

      This says it was done explicitly to win over Black voters…

      Like, if Biden wanted to make up for his border comments by mandating Taco Tuesday at the White House.

      Or since he didn’t decriminalize cannabis federally, he gives every American a coupon for a free slushie from 7/11.

      Or gave advocoda toast to everyone over 30 that can’t afford to buy a house in America.

      Like, fried chicken and watermelon isn’t racist, it’s delicious. But if you daughter is dating a Black man and that’s what for dinner the first time he comes over. It’s questionable.

      But if you tell him you made it to win him and over and prove your not racist…

      By saying the reason is to win over specifically that demographic, it means you’re so out of touch you don’t realize that makes it more racist. You’re throwing away any plausible deniability.

      Even if it’s good intentioned, it’s a racial stereotype you’re just voluntarily telling everyone you believe in.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        My brother in christ, you just said that literally everything is racist. Take a step back and think about that.