• flossdaily@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is just the smallest tip of the iceberg.

    I’ve been working with gpt-4 since the week it came out, and I guarantee you that even if it never became any more advanced, it could already put at least 30% of the white collar workforce out of business.

    The only reason it hasn’t is because companies have barely started to comprehend what it can do.

    Within 5 years the entire world will have been revolutionized by this technology. Jobs will evaporate faster than anyone is talking about.

    If you’re very smart, and you begin to use gpt-4 to write the tools that will replace you, then you MIGHT have 10 good years left in this economy before humans are all but obsolete.

    If you’re not staying up nights, scared shitless by what’s coming, it’s because you don’t really understand what gpt-4 can do.

    • applebusch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      You sound like one of those idiots preaching the apocalypse from a street corner. Humans obsolete in 10 years? Yeah sure buddy, right after all those profits trickle down. This is just another tool, an interesting one to be sure, but still just a tool. If you’re staying up nights worrying about this, you don’t really understand the technology, or maybe you’re just worried someone is going to realize you don’t do shit.

      • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re staying up nights worrying about this, you don’t really understand the technology

        And you think managers, the people deciding who gets replaced by AI, understand the technology?

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is part of the problem. They don’t, and won’t, fully understand the technology or its limitations or long-term impacts. They will understand that the salesman pushing the AI product told them it could eliminate 5-10% of their workforce. Whether or not the product can actually do that effectively won’t matter, they’ll still buy it, implement it, and fire a bunch of people.

      • variants@possumpat.io
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think once sap and jira start implementing a lot more AI and make it simpler to use it could cut down a lot of corporate jobs, not the hands on stuff but a lot of the simpler jobs like purchasing and inventory staff could be shrunken down to a fewer people and fewer cubicles. At least that’s what we talked about at our company how everyone is adjusting to the new world especially advertising now that everything will be served to you by a bot instead of a search

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You sound like one of those peasants standing on street corners saying, “horses replaced with fuming metal boxes in 10 years? Hah, yeah, sure buddy, right after we put a man on the moon! Getoutta here, you loon!”

      • flossdaily@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yup. This is why it is vital that we all get behind Universal Basic Income.

        The jobs will leave and they won’t come back. UBI is inevitable, but if we don’t get there soon enough there will be years of suffering and poverty for hundreds of millions.

      • Papanca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for sharing. If you see that list of type of jobs at the end, it’s easy to see which jobs could get replaced within a reasonably short amount of time. Greed will always find a way to profit from whatever development arises. If they have 1 mountain of gold, they want 2 mountains of gold.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m a senior Linux sysadmin who’s been following the evolution of AI over this past year just like you, and just like you I’ve been spending my days and nights tinkering with it non stop, and I have come to more or less the same conclusion as you have.

      The downvotes are from people who haven’t used the AI, and who are still in the Internet 1.0 mindset. How people still don’t get just how revolutionary this technology is, is beyond me. But yeah, in a few years that’ll be evident enough, time will show.

        • A_A@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          @flossdaily@lemmy.world
          @anarchy79@lemmy.world
          @SirGolan@lemmy.sdf.org
          I quite agree.

          And, from SirGolan ref : Submitted on 3 Oct 2023 Language Models Represent Space and Time
          … (from the summary) …Our analysis demonstrates that modern LLMs acquire structured knowledge about fundamental dimensions such as space and time, supporting the view that they learn not merely superficial statistics, but literal world models.
          https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.02207


          What makes it worse (in my opinion) is that LLMs are just one step in this development (which is exponential and not limited by human capabilities).
          For example :
          Numenta launches brain-based NuPIC to make AI processing up to 100 times more efficient
          https://lemmy.world/post/4941919

            • A_A@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Hi @anarchy79@lemmy.world,

              since I forgot what I was saying here 4 months ago I read the whole thread again and basically what I said is that I agree with what you said then (4 months ago) and I added a couple of references//ideas to make this point stronger.

              Also, I have no idea why you did receive this notification only today, 4 months after the discussion. I guess the Lemmy software is buggy since for my account I did not receive some notifications in a few instances where someone replied to some of my comments and I just happened to see those replies anyway since I was reading all again.

              take care, 👍