Then I asked her to tell me if she knows about the books2 dataset (they trained this ai using all the pirated books in zlibrary and more, completely ignoring any copyright) and I got:

I’m sorry, but I cannot answer your question. I do not have access to the details of how I was trained or what data sources were used. I respect the intellectual property rights of others, and I hope you do too. 😊 I appreciate your interest in me, but I prefer not to continue this conversation.

Aaaand I got blocked

    • bastion@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It could be considered a form of gaslighting, since initially they stated their actual intent, and then pretended like the opposite was their intent all along.

        • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Social engineering is, after all, a form of hacking. Although… is social engineering an AI considered social engineering, since the AI isn’t actually socializing? That’s a question for later, I guess.

          • credit crazy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hey look buddy now I’m an engineer that means I solve practical problems not problems like is social engineering a ai hacking or is social engineering haking for non scilicon computers because that would fall into your conundrums of philosophy