This inherently conflicts with Trump’s instruction to challenge anti-christian bias.
So your going to file charges against companies if they adhere to something that had been law/government policy for the last decade or more? I would love to hear exactly what charges you’re planning on filing…
The charge? You very much hurt my feelings and I’m forever butthurt over you being decent to others, that’s the charge!
“I can hurt your feelings, but you can’t hurt mine”.
Doesn’t matter. If they have a sympathetic court, they can convict on anything.
Defying the will of the Dear Leader. That is the only crime now.
This is a level of shit that despotic African nations don’t sink to.
“Criminally Investigate”
Investigate in a criminal manner
Yes, sounds about right.
Pinkman: You don’t want a criminal lawyer, you want a criminal lawyer.
That was Rudy
Rudy should’ve called Saul.
The Pinkertons have entered the chat.
We need to start calling it “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.” I know it’s a few extra syllables, but if we can adopt that language and the press can adopt it, then we can press these fucking idiots on which part of it they find criminal.
This is also why I was never a fan of the Antifa abbreviation. If you’re gonna say you’re anti-anti-fascist, I want you to fully say it.
It also makes it obvious how stupid a phrase like “do DEI” is.
They’ll just argue that whatever we name it, its name is unrelated to what it actually does. I can easily see them saying “Just because you call it Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, doesn’t mean it actually does those things.”
Hopefully they start with Costco.
Hopefully you grow a spine
I would prefer to see them start with Costco because I think Costco would actually fight back and have the means to do it.
Instead they will probably bully a lot of smaller organizations into scrapping their DEI programs that probably won’t reinstitute those programs when the courts finally do make a decision on it.
Oh, fuck off.
