• Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    71
    ·
    4 days ago

    I mean, the Epic Store exists. Well, not on Linux. And it’s missing a lot of features the other storefronts have.

      • Kichae@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        So, they’re both out to fuck everyone, and just playing for different teams?

        • justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Steam, for all of the good it did still normalized digital distribution of games. Its normal now that we dont own the games we play they exist on corporate servers, and can be rescinded at the drop of a corporate whim.

        • Azzu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          At least it has been sometime since the US invaded a neighbor for territorial expansion…

          • tibi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Easier to install puppet governments than try to integrate more angry people into the population.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yes yes, bitch eating crackers and all that.

          But can we maybe focus on what they actually are shit at (which is a lot) rather than manufacturing virtue for other companies?

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            I’m not sure which part of that guys comment suggests anything other other than “fuck epic,” but here’s a short and sweet list:

            • Designing a service for their customers instead of relying on paid exclusivity to encourage social pressure or FOMO
            • Halfway decent customer support
            • Unreal Engine 5’s performance
            • Keeping their old of games accessible
            • Not scamming kids out of virtual money
            • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Also, they

              • Fucked over Unreal fans by dropping the new Unreal Tournament the moment Fortnite took off (this one is personal, I was looking forward to that)
              • Fucked over people who bought Fortnite Save the World (the original paid PvE mode of the game) by dropping that the moment the Battle Royale mode took off (this is objectively worse than UT because people paid for this)

              Edit: Also want to mention Timmy’s frequent trash talking of Linux on Twitter

      • TheEntity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Not nearly the same degree. GOG sells actual Linux games with no 3rd party software necessary to play them. The same cannot be said about EGS, one simply cannot launch an EGS game in an officially supported way.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          For a very limited subset of games, they provide linux binaries. For the rest? You are up a creek and in the realm of “Figure it out”. Which… is generally the Heroic Launcher (or Lutris for a subset) which puts you in the same boat as Epic.

          If you insist upon saying one store is more virtuous than the other… okay? I personally don’t like defending companies but you do you.

          But for the vast majority of games? Epic and GoG are in the same category as basically everything but Steam. And both are in the exact same category regarding launchers and download services since they both heavily rely on the Heroic Launcher (which is awesome).

          And, to be clear, neither should be applauded for Linux support.


          Well, to be clearer. The folk behind the Heroic Launcher (and Lutris) SHOULD be applauded. And I think there is actually a very strong argument that store fronts should not be expected to build out entire social media ecosystems with attached updaters (what launchers basically are). But both Epic and GoG have decided to half ass that so they should be called out for not doing it “right”.

          • TheEntity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            If you insist upon saying one store is more virtuous than the other… okay? I personally don’t like defending companies but you do you.

            Could you please not put words into my mouth? Neither is “virtuous” and I am not defending them. Let’s stick to the facts instead. It’s clear that EGS is being actively hostile towards Linux, while GOG is merely negligent. EGS actively removed Linux support from previously supported games on at least one occasion (Rocket League).

            • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              You’re doing it again.

              As a publisher: Yes, Epic stopped the Rocket League devs from continuing to build Linux binaries. To my knowledge, they have not disabled “support” for Proton in any of the anti-cheat solutions.

              Similarly, the development branch of CD Projekt (the parent company of GoG), apparently had Linux binaries for The Witcher 2. They do not for The Witcher 3 or Cyberpunk.

              Both companies decided it was not worth internally supporting Linux and instead rely on Proton/Wine to do it for them. Whether that is good for gaming is debatable, but both are “actively hostile towards Linux” in that regard.


              If you do want to criticize the handling of Linux then I would suggest looking into the Unreal Engine marketplace (or whatever they call it now) being a complete shitshow for Linux developers. Which is ironic since the UE documentation is actually great for Linux devs. I cannot speak to the CDPR efforts with their modding SDKs since I haven’t opened one since The Witcher 1 (when it was either a hacked version of the NWN toolkit or an officially hacked version of the NWN toolkit).

              But that is Epic and CDP not EGS and GoG.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          GOG sells actual Linux games with no 3rd party software necessary to play them.

          Ah yes, stand-alone binary installers that work only on a very tiny set of Linux versions because they rely on specific version of system libraries, sometimes contain distribution-specific hardcoded paths, and so on. I especially like those older Linux ports that exclusively target Nvidia drivers because why would anyone just have coded to the OpenGL standard back then…

          We have Flatpak Runtimes and Steam Linux Runtimes since years. CD Project / GOG can’t even be bothered to pick these existing open source solutions.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      The approved competitor to a monopoly is… *checks notes* a wannabe monopoly that’s trying to buy their way into the position by providing less for the customer and instead bribing the publishers for exclusivity?

      No, thanks. I would rather stick with the existing monopoly than reward Epic’s anticompetitive and anti-consumer bullshit.

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I guess, yeah. I will say, though: it feels morally wrong to acknowledge their existence as anything other than a anti-consumer cashgrab, and thus give them legitimacy as a competitor to Steam, GOG, and Itch.