US v. Skrmetti could slow the wave of anti-trans laws—or tell policymakers it’s “open season.”

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      You don’t have a choice if you’re arguing for precedent and overturning the status quo.

      When else are they going to do it anyways? In twenty years?

      • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 days ago

        You have to pick your battles. The chances that the current justices will overturn the status quo in favor of trans people is basically non-existant.

        So yes, you should wait until the court is made up of people who have a chance of ruling in your favor to avoid a ruling that denying gender affirming care is constitutional.