US v. Skrmetti could slow the wave of anti-trans laws—or tell policymakers it’s “open season.”

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    You don’t have a choice if you’re arguing for precedent and overturning the status quo.

    When else are they going to do it anyways? In twenty years?

    • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 days ago

      You have to pick your battles. The chances that the current justices will overturn the status quo in favor of trans people is basically non-existant.

      So yes, you should wait until the court is made up of people who have a chance of ruling in your favor to avoid a ruling that denying gender affirming care is constitutional.