In the hours following former President Donald Trump’s election victory, Google searches related to 4B — a fringe South Korean feminist movement that made a name for itself in the mid to late 2010s — surged in the United States.

  • lettruthout@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not all men backed the ugliness. (To lump them altogether is sexist.) The ones who didn’t should be supported.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I’m sure pulling an Idiocracy will turn this whole thing around.

        See how useful that is?

      • Joeffect@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Because we all know the response to that is too many men? Right? But women voted against women, how do you fix that? How do you sit and blame all the men for your problems when it was also women who wanted these things to happen?

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Men also voted trump. An apt analogy would be: can we blame white people for Trump?

          Yes, yes we can.

          • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Men also voted for Trump.

            Yes. That’s the exact thing I’m arguing against; just because >50% of a group did something doesn’t mean you get to go around blaming the portions of that group that didn’t do that thing. It’s frankly amazing that you completely missed the point and tried to turn it right back around.

            You can’t even just blame white people, his numbers from black and Latino voters also increased.

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Hey look it’s the rhetoric that lost us the election

            It turns out we really, really need the specific demographic that sees a comment like this and thinks “leftists don’t like me so I’m voting red”

            • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              You’re right. I keep forgetting that people are emotional creatures who don’t understand how elections work. Gotta pander to these people by using soft words and stroking their ego.

              • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Or, hear me out, don’t demonize a whole population because a small majority of their demographic voted bad. One week ago, I would have shared your opinion, but these election results are proof that we really need to figure out political strategies that get support from every demographic, even straight men.

                • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  It’s not demonizing a population. That’s the point.

                  The point is that women can’t tell the difference between the man that is safe and the man that will rape them. So until you’re determined to be safe, is smart to assume you’re not safe.

                  It’s the same as saying “people are horrible, but persons are great.”

                  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    Men also voted trump. An apt analogy would be: can we blame white people for Trump?

                    Yes, yes we can.

                    This is what you said. You said that we can blame white people for Trump. Some would call this “demonizing an entire population because a small majority of their demographic voted bad”

                    Personally I think it’s more accurate to say we can blame conservatives for trump, since being conservative is the biggest indicator that someone voted for him

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Please look up why telling people to look something up instead of explaining it to them is ineffective at best, and counterproductive at worst

        Actually, I’ll just explain it: it’s condescending, which while you may feel it warranted, is not an effective persuasion tactic.

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Then genuinely, don’t say anything. You are a representative of a political ideology, and when you condescendingly tell people to educate themselves on a subject instead of writing a short paragraph, or finding them specific reading material, you make the entire political ideology look lazy and elitist.

            The common response I’ve gotten to the sentiment that I’ve just shared over the last 4 years is “fuck 'em, we don’t need people who aren’t willing to educate themselves.” As we can all see right now, this is incorrect. We need to garner support from people that we don’t like, and that means treating them with civility even when they don’t know things that we think they should.

            • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Just so I’m sure… You’re saying to pander to the uneducated and trick them into believing your side is right?

              People won’t change unless they want to. If they want to, then telling them what to look up in sufficient. If they don’t want to, there’s no point.

              • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                No. I’m saying that there is a large group of people in this country who don’t strongly believe in anything. When they see one side saying “they’re eating the dogs and the cats, they want to trans your kids and that’s bad” and the other side saying “you should look up why what you just said it stupid,” they’re going to do a 2024 election and at best not show up.

                People won’t change unless they want to.

                You’re naive. Daryl Davis was able to unracist 200 members of the KKK. Do you think telling them to “look it up” would have been sufficient? Most people are open to change, but they won’t be convinced by someone that isn’t willing to put in a modicum of effort past “look it up.”

                  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    For one I’m not black, so no. But also you don’t need to be. I provided him as proof against your idea that people will only change if they want to, and that if they want to, simply telling them to do more research is sufficient. There are options between “be a brave and charismatic black man venturing into the heart of a movement that exists to kill you,” and “leave snide comments on Lemmy.”

                    You could, for example, engage in dialogue with someone, politely rebutting the incorrect assumptions they make without demanding that they rebut their own arguments for you. You may not convince many people this way, but you will convince more people than the snide remarks guy.

    • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      wHy WON’t ThESE Women wHO ARe beIng oppRESSeD And HAVInG tHEir rIghts erodeD sUPPort mEn LIke Me WHo aRE tHe rEaL VIcTImS aNd CleArlY so syMPaTHETic tO THEIR cAUSE???!111122345

      You are precisely the kind of insidious creep we want to avoid.

      • lettruthout@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Who said women aren’t being oppressed? Who said that men are being oppressed? Who said I was a man?

        Sorry if you’ve been hurt, but that is no excuse for sexism. To be clear: lumping all men into a group is sexism. Grouping all people by some factor that is beyond their control is prejudice. It’s really as simple as that. Again, I’m sorry if you’ve been hurt, but that’s no excuse for that response.

        To repeat: the reality is that not all men back the ugliness that Trump and his supporters promote. To claim otherwise is to rob yourself of allies. It is self defeating.