You forgot the part where you Chicken out and go back on everything so you lose on both sides… No one ever sees it coming
- 0 Posts
- 314 Comments
Joined 2 年前
Cake day: 2023年6月21日
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
41·4 天前You forgot it’s Obama fault that they are making it a fascist regime… How dare that guy be president
It’s almost as if the narrative of these being criminals is a lie… Wouldn’t the first thing a criminal would on seeing a gang of masked men be to idono fucking shoot them?
You would probably be surprised at how much they don’t care and just want your engagement especially depending on the algorithm
You interacted with it… It doesn’t care if you don’t like it… You interacted with it… You have feelings to it… If you get more of that content what are you more likely to do?
Interact with it…
Stop interacting with it … Ignore it…
Stop scrolling brain rot is the best thing you can do… Watch channels that teach you something… Lots of good creators out there with fun content… That you can learn from…
4·11 天前Why though? You have other options less detrimental to the internet than using and supporting them…
This is dumb…
If you self host and your power goes out …
Think about it
31·11 天前Unless it’s a switch 2 then all you get is a key on the cartridge… Biggest waste of time on both sides
5·11 天前You forgot the part where he said he didn’t need your votes because he already won…
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-laura-ingraham-future-voting_n_66a85c2ae4b0e33a3bb7cd36
But when you’re fueled by greed and you don’t care about human lives and your only concern is to have more money and property…
Because that’s the goal here… They don’t give a shit about others especially when they are not white… Well rich… But you get it…
https://time.com/7212848/trump-gaza-own/
So yes it’s about killing people to steal their land… Sound familiar? It’s just as important to understand the end goal…
It wouldn’t have but we wouldn’t be getting plans to build a trump tower in its place because it’s prime beach real estate
I’m pretty sure Mothra is a moth
I’m not debating the literal version history of Windows or pretending compatibility issues don’t matter. My point always was from the beginning, conceptual. It’s about drawing a line and imagining a clean break from legacy systems, like starting from a Gen2 OS with no baggage.
If that idea still isn’t clear, that’s fine because clearly we are talking past each other at this point. I’ve explained it multiple ways to you, and I’m not interested in continuing this when you clearly refuse to even attempt to look past the current versioning system of windows… Which clearly makes me wrong somehow, even though it’s a hypothetical situation…
Last thing…
“You could have just said, oh, if there already was a version 2, let’s just call it “Windows Gen2” instead of getting belligerent.”
That’s not what I meant at all… It doesn’t matter if version two exists in my hypothetical situation or windows 9 or 22 even…
If you started a whole new operating system based on new technologies… And called it windows 2 not Windows 2.0
Look at it this way no one got confused when overwatch two came out and thought it was just overwatch path 2.0
I mean that would never happen but sounds like a good time
But it’s what they want… It’s part of the plan… even just the idea to cause uncertainty and confusion… They want to enact material law… running is a choice but fighting fascist racist felon dictators is the only real choice and if they can delay the elections because of civil unrest or whatever bullshit they are trying…
California is basically its own country it has everything it needs… But you can’t fight trump like a politician… You have to play his game and beat him… He’s a bully and a coward… Saying we won’t pay taxes does nothing to protect the people on the streets
That looks like President Trump how crazy
How do you not understand grouping the current windows operating system from the first version to windows 11 together as one thing? Is that too hard to wrap your head around? Do you know how to group things together?
And then you can assign it as anything you want it like I did in my example as version one and the. The next group is version two…
You understand how that works?
You can have a version one that so happens to have something called version two in it… Maybe we could label it as 1.2 and the current version of windows in this instance would be 1.11…
So you start a new version line as 2.0 and rebuild the whole thing not worrying about compatibility issues…
Fuckin crazy how you can do that right?
And since we live in the age of ai trash…
have a break down of the nonsense…
🧠 What Person A is trying to say:
They’re proposing a conceptual versioning system, where all existing Windows versions — no matter how they’re officially labeled — are retroactively grouped as “version 1” of a broader era. Then they suggest Microsoft should start fresh with a “version 2” — a clean-slate OS that abandons backward compatibility and legacy code entirely.
That’s not unreasonable as a conceptual framework. It’s a design-oriented, future-focused proposal — not a literal historical claim.
🧾 What Person B is saying:
Person B interpreted Person A’s idea literally, assuming Person A didn’t understand actual Windows version history (Windows 1, 2, 3, 95, NT, etc.), and got annoyed. Their response, while technically accurate, is more about proving correctness than engaging with the idea Person A was floating.
💢 What Person C is doing:
Person C is just being unnecessarily inflammatory. Name-calling like “daft cunt syndrome” doesn’t add anything — it’s the kind of comment that derails any constructive conversation.
🔍 My Analysis:
Person A has a rough communication style and comes off as condescending, which provoked the others — but the idea they’re putting forward isn’t “wrong,” just misunderstood. They want a clean break from legacy Windows.
Person B is correct about Windows historical versioning but is missing the spirit of the conceptual proposal. They got baited and lashed out.
Person C just made everything worse.
🧩 Final Thought:
It would have gone much better if Person A said:
“Imagine grouping all current Windows versions as ‘generation 1’, and now proposing a totally fresh OS as ‘generation 2’ with no legacy baggage.”
Instead, it got personal and defensive fast. So — valid idea, poor delivery. And the responses just escalated instead of clarifying.
Let me know if you want this explained in a funnier tone, like a courtroom transcript or mock forum.
He will chicken out and give the nukes to them… And call it the most brilliant thing anyone has ever done