• SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 days ago

      Waterworld is fine. It just gets ragged on because of its insane budget and the lackluster results for said budget. But if you don’t care about that and just watch a movie, it’s a decent movie.

      The Simpsons joke where the tie in video game needs 40 quarters is still funny though.

      • Welt@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Is that simply a reference to it going over budget? I never got that joke.

        • SSTF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 days ago

          The movie was infamously over budget. It basically doubled from its initial budget and was for the time a record expensive movie to make. All of that for a final product that was fine but not really showing all that money on screen. It was the topic of many late night show jokes and such.

    • ooli@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I watched it at release time. And the scene where Kevin Kostner run through his boat activating various sail and gadget to escape the bad guy is still engraved in my memory as the most badass thing ever. Was obsessed about the revelation of him having gills too.

      All that because it was heavily inspired of one of my favorite Sci-fi series: The Pandora Sequence by F. Herbert (where the 2 last book are on a water planet, where human evolved for this world)

      NB: the second book in the series was the source material for a more successful movie “Avatar” by Cameron. In the “Jesus incident” the planet is hostile to human, and there is a magical plant controlling it named “avata”… just to name a few similarity … they are endless

    • Professorozone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Like most, I totally disagree. However, it had such great potential.

      I feel the same about Valerian. The imagery was pure eye candy and then I watched it, so looking forward to a great flick, and what I got was… Valerian.

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        The setting and design in Valerian is fantastic. The opening sequence really is among the best in film. Shame about the plot and main characters.

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          The plot was bad, but I don’t think I’ve ever seen a movie close to how bad the romantic chemistry was between the main characters. There was negative chemistry, in fact they felt more like brother and sister which just made the whole thing creepy.

      • Et Al@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Valerian and Laureline should have been played by a young Bruce Campbell and Angelina Jolie. I will say that the two actual actors are good, but having them as those characters was the very definition of miscast.

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yep. Great movie, watched it in cinema and a few times later. Still don’t understand how people didn’t like it.

    • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      “'Cause she’s my friend.” Will always have my respect for not phoning it in and just cashing the check.