• njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    This might be one of the few times I think Donald Trump is actually telling the truth. I 100% believe Tim Cook is calling him and begging for shit.

  • macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    So, why should we care?

    “He [Cook] said something that was interesting,” Trump said. “He said they’re using that to run their enterprise, meaning Europe is their enterprise. “I said, ‘That’s a lot… But Tim, I got to get elected first, but I’m not going to let them take advantage of our companies — that won’t, you know, be happening.’”

    suure… but hey, when they don’t pay, I guess its fine to the Orange man, that Cuck won’t be able to sell in Europe, eh?

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      JD Vance is literally Silicon Valley’s candidate, sponsored by PayPal’s Peter Thiel, and likely to take over if Trump gets into office.

      It’s absolutely something Apple’s head would do. They’re not exactly know for their morality. FoxxConn workers can tell you that as they roll out of the suicide nets.

      • athairmor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        JD Vance is the tech bro VC candidate. There’s a huge difference between Tim Cook and 90s boom era tech bros. Apple’s success doesn’t give a fuck about middle-school mentality masculinity. Not every tech company is so insecure.

        • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          “My billionaire is a good one though!”

          I’ll never understand people who try to step in and defend do-nothing billionaires - they’re all morality free nihilists who value profit above all else. They’re all ruthless.

          • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            So is Trump/Vance good for business? For all I know that’s true of a few [types of] businesses only, e.g. fossil fuels are an obvious one. But to Apple, IRA-enabled investment opportunities may be more relevant than availability of fossil fuels.

            • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              It’s impossible to know what outcomes Trump/Vance would produce and who that would be good for.

              Could be anything from a hardline but peaceful form of traditionalist authoritarianism. To fascism and WW3 with internal purges and massacres of “the enemies within”.

              I don’t think any of Trump’s plans will be good for business though because an increase in the wealth gap generally means you’re creating a deepening sense of monopoly and corruption, and that generally means richer people at the top, less casual consumption and money flowing in the economy in the lower-middle, and stagnation and poverty at the bottom (with the poorest squeezing by and only spending on essentials, possibly becoming homeless).

              How long these outcomes take to form who knows.

              But outside of that, the US economy is having a mild recovery and is generally in an upswing that should continue if which ever government gets in is stable and fairly sensible.