A Massachusetts couple claims that their son's high school attempted to derail his future by giving him detention and a bad grade on an assignment he wrote using generative AI.

A Massachusetts couple claims that their son’s high school attempted to derail his future by giving him detention and a bad grade on an assignment he wrote using generative AI.

An old and powerful force has entered the fraught debate over generative AI in schools: litigious parents angry that their child may not be accepted into a prestigious university.

In what appears to be the first case of its kind, at least in Massachusetts, a couple has sued their local school district after it disciplined their son for using generative AI tools on a history project. Dale and Jennifer Harris allege that the Hingham High School student handbook did not explicitly prohibit the use of AI to complete assignments and that the punishment visited upon their son for using an AI tool—he received Saturday detention and a grade of 65 out of 100 on the assignment—has harmed his chances of getting into Stanford University and other elite schools.

Yeah, I’m 100% with the school on this one.

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    15 days ago

    In my 20+ year career (god I’m old) every time I felt like I was cheating I was praised for figuring out a faster way to do it.

    Granted, the point of education is to learn something and having an AI spit out an essay means you’ve failed at demonstrating your knowledge.

    But let’s not pretend that using shortcuts isn’t rewarded outside of school.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pubEnglish
      1·
      15 days ago

      …if you get a tough job, one that is hard, and you haven’t got a way to make it easy, put a lazy man on it, and after 10 days he will have an easy way to do it, and you perfect that way and you will have it in pretty good shape.

      Clarence E. Bleicher