The number, of course, is grossly inflated, since the statistical engines are now embedded in virtually everything, and it’s really difficult to even avoid them.

I.e. If you type something in google, and there’s an AI summary at the top, it 100% counts that as an ‘active use’.

The person in the article needs professional help, please don’t propagate anecdotal sob stories (that may or may not be false) on “Fuck AI”. “Fuck” in “Fuck AI” is not what you think it means.

How does that have anything to do with what I wrote?

It’s like saying “Everyone hates smoking”, which is broadly true, since it affects everyone, not just the smokers. And there’s definitely hundreds of millions of smokers who smoke every day.

If he’s “the left”, I don’t want to be anywhere near it.

He doesn’t care about the people, he just hates the US. Hating US does not make you “Left”.

Terminology changes and bad terminology can and should be changed.

Anthromorphising software only helps the ones that are pushing it.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

You know, Tran Right.

With FOUR tough questions this time.

“Observation flags: (u) low reliability”

Yeah, that tracks.

Mainly intentional disinformation about russia’s war in Ukraine and intentional disinformation regarding immigration.

People think because there are more darker skinned people arround it’s the reason their life is getting worse. (While actually it’s increased inequality)

TL,DR: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram.

Tipping is basically donating money to the waiting staff (in a broader sense, to the management of the restaurant).

I think there are more people in need of donations than the ones who move your food 10 steps.

I would 10000% pick my own food and cary it to the table, as I often do in many “”“lower class”“” restaurants (diners?)

That, or add a flat service charge, add it to the check and pay fucking taxes (this is directed to the management).

I don’t tip. But I don’t live in the US.

There are a bunch of things that I want to put into this reply, but I know that it will just be read as defensive.

I’m more interested to hear why you think, what you wrote, is important to this conversation, because you had a point and masked it in a question.

That is factually incorrect, and there are modlogs to back it up.

Same way people disliking or pointing out flaws in “AI” are “trolling”.

The difference is, you don’t get banned here for discussing things.

For an instance who bans people for being an “Anti-AI troll”, you’re pretty loud with your “Pro-AI trolling”.

Art is not about the destination. It’s about the journey. Deaf compositors made music knowing they would never hear it.