• Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 minutes ago
    1. I don’t work here. Stop trying to get me to do the job for free, either pay a cashier to check me out or fuck off.
    2. There’s an epidemic of these machines not working and then the shopper getting charged with shoplifting over it, Wal-Mart is the worst at doing this.
  • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I mean, both are right. Clients shouldn’t have to do the cashier job.

    But clients should stop going there to send a message instead of harassing the minimum salary employee.

  • ntma@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I like hanging out in parking lots at Walmarts and to scam boomers coming back with a load of groceries

  • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Management can fuck right the hell off. Self checkout is taking jobs away from people and getting us to work for free.

  • DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I live here in Toronto.

    When I go to a store, I pay with cash.

    I pay with Canadian money, because I’m a Canadian who buys from stores in Canada.

    That was easy to do in Ontario Wal-Mart stores.

    But then they put up self-check-outs that only accepted credit and debit cards—maybe because they’re in cahoots with the banks and the NSA/wp:CSEC.

    Then I had to use a cashier.

    So I went to Wal-Mart fewer times as I didn’t like to wait (as well as the increased prices during and after Covid-19).

    Now they have a person at the self-checkout who will scan my stuff and accept my cash.

    It seems that Wal-Mart adapted—somewhat—to people like me: people who pay with cash.

    Still, I do more purchases at Food Basics and Dollarama because their self-check-outs accept cash, including pockets full of loose change that I purposely carry when I go there.

  • 01011@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Never understood that argument. I want to be in and out as quickly as possible. Self checkout makes that happen.

  • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The self checkout is a perfectly viable option, so long as Walmart can find the strength inside themselves to open 3-6 manned tills on a Sunday for folks with large carts or children. Nothing is more demoralizing than getting up to the checkouts after a huge shop and finding there isn’t a single till open whatsoever. Throw in a four-year-old who wants to help scan every item and you’re ready to burn the store down by the time you leave.

  • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The closest Walmart to me has about a dozen or so self checkout tills and there is usually a line of 20 people waiting to get to them. There’s 3 cashiers that are there to badge the machines when they need to check ID for alcohol or override the machine if you double scan an item. I love self checkouts in other stores but Walmart has always been infuriating.

      • DillyDaily@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Why bother going through the checkout at all, the fastest way out is straight through the door. Unrelated, the weather is changing so I’m thinking of buying a really big coat, and I’ll want pockets for my keys and other essentials.

      • neonred@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        34
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        I don’t know where you live but here theft is a crime and very antisocial and despicable.

        Someone has to pay for the thieves and prices rise because they have to compensate for theft. Even if prices in reality do not need to compensate, because margin is already big enough, it gives retail a free card to jack prices, which, in essence, is yet again against consumers.

        • DillyDaily@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I genuinely can’t tell if you’re being facetious.

          I thought you were fully serious, but then I hit the line

          Even if prices in reality do not need to compensate, because margin is already big enough, it gives retail a free card to jack prices,

          And assumed you were just poking fun and the poor widdle corporations and their giant profit margins, but then you continued with your paragrap, and now I’m not sure again…

          • neonred@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            7 hours ago

            But maybe you can explain where all the downvotes come from, because I don’t understand.

            Is thievery good? Only when thieving from companies? Is is socially acceptable to take what is not yours from others? Only from companies? Or from a stranger who has more than you? From a friend? What’s this all about?

          • neonred@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            No, I’m serious in all statements. Corpos will jack prices on any occassion that offers itself, so keep the number of those low.

        • NickwithaC@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I don’t know where YOU live but Walmart is one of the biggest thieves in the USA. People working there still have to collect government assistance because they pay too little to live on.

        • lseif@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 hours ago

          it gives retail a free card to jack prices

          so blame the corpos for that. not your neighbour stealing some chicken.

  • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I refuse to use them as a union worker, when I’m told to use the self checkout as I’m in line for the only cashier I just refuse. I’m doing it for you kids

    • veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 minutes ago

      This is broken window fallacy, akin to throwing garbage on the floor so some custodian keeps his job. These workers still have other shit to do. I get to waste less time waiting. So it’s win-win-win situation.

  • neonred@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    14 hours ago

    This says much about respect and social competence in this society when the first instinct is to mock and abuse someone with different priorities than yours.

        • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          asking for a cashier?

          That would be normal

          “I don’t work here”

          Is a rude response to the question whether they would like to use the self-checkout.

          • neonred@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            service is not something the client has to ask for but something the vendor provides. Just like you hold a door open for someone entering behind you, you provide that service, unasked. Having to ask for service is a failure in itself, it’s just “no service”.

        • NuanceDemon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          You mean demanding special attention rather than using the self-checkout like everyone else? Not sure I understand.

          • neonred@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            “service” is no “special attention” but I get to the conclusion our misunderstanding might be a socio-cultural thing

          • eleitl@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I expect that the management is responsible for adequate staffing. Self-checkout typically doesn’t even work. Not a boomer, not USian, YMMV.

              • eleitl@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Typically they need attendant attention, to be reset to be usable. Which makes it rather pointless. My expectation that checkout lines are to be adequately staffed with cashiers. This is, however, increasingly not a safe assumption, in Germany. I expect the situation to further deteriorate. As does everything else.

  • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I was once mistaken for an employee somewhere and my sleep deprivated response was to say “I am wearing pants so clearly I dont work here.” I have no fucken clue what that means but I think it was a threat.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Pretty sure I was at an Ace hardware or some shit. Like I said I was severely sleep deprived and was looking for something, pretty sure it was duck tape for reinforcing an air conditioner.

        Frankly speaking once I got to my car and realized what I said I started laughing my ass off since it was such a non sequitur.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Not wanting to do free work for a company (they don’t even give you a discount if you use self-service) is being a boomer?

    That’s the first time I’ve seen the word “boomer” on the opposite side of the word “sucker”.

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Refuse to do free work for a company—insist that the grocery store employees go and gather the items on your list from the shelves for you! Never set foot on the sales floor, do pickup orders online only!

      Background: It used to be that the proprietor of a store brought items you requested to the counter for you. In 1916, Piggly Wiggly pioneered a new grocery store model, requiring/allowing the customers to pick items off of the shelves themselves. Not only did they not give you a discount for doing their work for them, they raked in more money from impulse purchases. The increased sales more than offset the increase in shoplifting losses. A cynical, corporate ploy to bleed customers dry, and we just think it’s normal now!

      That is to say, the purpose of a grocery store is to provide food in exchange for currency. There’s no law of nature that I know of that says that having an underpaid teenager drag your food across the scanner is the only proper way to do check-out, just like there isn’t one that says only a store employee can pick items from the shelf.

      • evranch@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        In other words, race to the bottom is race to the bottom.

        Those jobs were not cruel and demeaning as you seem to imply. In fact plenty of industries still operate that way (auto parts etc.) and they served a valuable purpose, to give work experience to that underpaid teenager.

        In fact if you go to a butcher shop, fishmonger, farm market etc. you will have your food handed to you by a human as well. And most people highly rate both the service and quality at such shops, with the employees usually being paid significantly more than at supermarkets, and having proper work hours and job security.

        So yes, I suppose Piggly Wiggly made food margins a little thinner. But considering I get better meat prices at my butcher than at a supermarket, who do you think benefited from that move the most? Most likely the same ones benefiting from the move towards a fully automated store like Amazon tested.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Maybe you can go the warehouse and pick it up from the boxes, drive down to the farm to het the produce or, even better, grow your own food ALL THE WHILE STILL PAYING FULL VALUE TO THE SUPERMARKET.

        “People used to have even more done for them and now they don’t and pay the same” is not the powerful argument for us having even less done for us that you think it is.

    • grandkaiser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Exactly! Back in my day, people used to fill up my gas for me and carry my things up to my hotel room. Young people are getting lazy and entitled! Corporations need to make them work harder. Makes it hard to humiliate the poors if they make ME do the work.

      • Acters@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Tbh back then the pay was more fairly in line with cost of living for some of the jobs. however, it has been a good 20 or so year since it was more fair. Nowadays, it is absolutely scary the cost of living. it’s down right criminal.