VAT should be going down - it was raised from 17.5% a few years ago as an emergency measure by Cameron and Osborne. How are we even talking about it going up again when it should be the opposite?
This is the best summary I could come up with:
the Conservatives and the Lib Dems have all ruled out raising value added tax (VAT) if they win the general election.Writing in the Telegraph, external, Chancellor Jeremy Hunt said the Tories would not raise the main rate of the sales tax during the next Parliament.He challenged Labour to make the same pledge, claiming the party had been evasive on the issue during recent media interviews.
It comes as the two main parties traded blows over their spending plans ahead of the start of the official five-week election campaign period starting on Thursday.Labour has pledged economic stability if it wins the election and had explicitly ruled out raising income tax if it enters office.It had also ruled out a hike to National Insurance, a payroll tax paid by employers and employees, and supported the government’s 2p cut to NI at the March Budget.On Tuesday, Ms Reeves said she was not planning further tax rises beyond those it has already announced.
This and other interview responses prompted Mr Hunt to suggest Labour had a “plan to increase VAT” if it enters office.
In his Telegraph piece, Mr Hunt said a VAT rise would “hammer families’ finances” and risk a rise in inflation, which has been returning towards the government’s 2% target.He added that the shadow chancellor, along with leader Sir Keir Starmer, had “repeatedly refused” to give a similarly explicit commitment.
I want taxes on working people to be lower not higher," she added.Mr Hunt sought to claim credit for the move, adding in a press release that Labour had “buckled under pressure” after refusing to rule out a rise “all week”.The pledge means Labour and the Tories have now both ruled out increasing VAT, income tax and National Insurance - the biggest and most reliable revenue-raisers from personal taxation - in the next Parliament.They are also both committed to a self-imposed rule that says national debt should be predicted to fall as a share of GDP in five years’ time in official forecasts.Both parties have accused each other’s spending pledges of shortcomings and having multi-billion pound black holes.Lib Dem Munira Wilson told BBC Breakfast: “We want to raise taxes in a fair way, not off the backs of hard working people.
We would reverse the cuts in tax to the big banks.”“I can’t give you that answer” when challenged if any particular individuals will face higher taxes.But she added that when the party’s manifesto is launched it will be fully costed.The Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) last week said that the state of public finances hangs over the election campaign “like a dark cloud”.The IFS warned that high interest payments on existing debt and low expected economic growth could make reducing future debt more difficult – whichever party is in government – without further measures.
The original article contains 609 words, the summary contains 464 words. Saved 24%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!