IBM selling The Weather Channel and the rest of its weather business::IBM will sell The Weather Company to Francisco Partners, a tech-focused private equity firm, for an undisclosed sum, it announced Tuesday.

  • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    167
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    In before a fascist wannabe billionaire buys the weather channel just to destroy any credibility it has and hijack the climate change debate. Even change the name of weather channel to something like “Y”.

    Let the enshittification begin.

  • ironcrotch@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I used to love Weather Underground but stopped using it once The Weather Channel took over but crazy that IBM own that, what an odd acquisition.

    • kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s incredible. Both of those apps INSTANTLY became so much worse after they were bought out.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        plus ça change with software disaster capitalism as always

        there’ll always be another app to ruin to make a quick buck

    • mint_tamas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      LogMeIn has way more free offerings now than just a couple of years ago. Source: used to work at LogMeIn. You are talking out of your ass.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Please don’t make Weather Underground shitty. It’s the only weather website that gives accurate information around here.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Maybe for you, but all the other weather websites I’ve tried are wrong. Even DarkSky was wrong half the time. It said sunny skies when we were in the middle of a blizzard once. I don’t know, maybe there’s something weird about where I am.

        • methodicalaspect@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          I had a similar experience with Dark Sky, but Weather Underground was always great. The weird part of it is that I’m near Chicago, where the NWS office got trashed for their awful handling of the forecast and response to the storms that led to the Plainfield F5 in 1990 - bad radar was often cited as a reason for that response, so NEXRAD especially has been key to NWS’s improvement here.

          It’s www.weather.gov/lot for me now.

    • Doubletwist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      They’ve been shitty since TWC bought them. Maybe a little before when they killed their old web interface which was informative and fast and replaced it with a new design that was difficult to read information, and worst of all, slow as fuck. That’s about when I stopped subscribing.

      • const_void@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        worst of all, slow as fuck.

        So true. Waiting 30 seconds to see the temperature is ridiculous.

    • ABeeinSpace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 months ago

      IBM will still sell you a brand new, updated mainframe in 2023.

      They’re also in the open source software space (IBM owns Red Hat, a software company that has a lot of projects for Linux. Red Hat has their own Linux distro too)

      • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Which threats users to had their subscription cancelled when they share the source code according to GPL.

        • ABeeinSpace@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah. I agree with ya there, Red Hat screwed over Alma and Rocky with that decision. I can see the utility of those two distros for testing before committing to RHEL.

          Plus, if Oracle has room to try to be the “good guys”, you’ve really screwed up

          • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Nobody was “testing” rhel by using Rocky or Alma, they just didn’t want to pay for it. I mean you can test actual rhel for free!

            • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Nah. Deploy Rocky or Alma in mass. Have RHEL for a few machines. When you got a problem, reproduce it in RHEL and call support.

              • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                That sounds pretty exploitative to me, and exactly the kind of use case that red hat wouldn’t want to support.

                Think about what “bug for bug compatibility” actually means, they’re promising not to make any fixes or contribute to the build in any way!

    • hglman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      We did away with that pesky business failures. Now all corporate are eternal.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I knew they were a thing because I run into them in IT from time to time… but had no idea they owned the weather channel. Wild.

  • to55@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Makes sense. Now they can focus more on their core business. Google recently sold it’s domain registry, I think it might be the same thing.

    • methodicalaspect@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think it’s fair to look at IBM with a more cynical eye. Historically it’s been “acquire, way you’ll make no changes, wait a bit, make changes that piss off 80% of your customer base.” Somewhere in there is a “reduce customer service effectiveness” step that is distinct from “make changes.”

      After that it’s either “sell it off to the highest bidder” or “keep at it because who else are the customers gonna use?”

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I hear this a lot, but every company I’ve been a part of that did it seemed to be a bad idea. If a division makes money, the only reason to sell is because you believe the investment in that division can be used to make more money (for less). Getting rid of a profitable entity is usually greed based.

      • BlackSpasmodic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s corporate-speak that means nothing. The same company “focused on it’s core business” today will buy something unrelated sometime later and say it’s “poised for growth in a growing market”.

  • bob@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Does anyone know of a great alternative weather app?