• masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    No it wouldn’t. You’d have git beginners committing IDE configs and secrets left and right if -A was the default behavior.

    No, you wouldn’t because no one is a git beginner, they’re a software developer beginner who need to use git. In that scenario, you are almost always using repos that are created by someone else or by some framework with precreated git ignores.

    You know what else it could do? Say “hey, youve said add with no files selected, press enter to add all changed files”

    Esc, :, q. Sure it’s a funny internet meme to say vim is impossible to quit out of, but any self-respecting software developer should know how, and if you don’t, you have google. If you think this is hard, no wonder you struggle with git.

    Dumping people into an archaic cli program that doesn’t follow the universal conventions for exiting a cli program, all for the the goal of entering 150 characters of text that can be captured through the CLI with one prompt, is bad CLI design.

    There is no reason to ever dump the user to an external editor unless they specifically request it, yet git does, knowing full well that that means VIM in many cases.

    And no, a self respecting software developer wouldn’t tolerate standards breaking, user unfriendly software and would change their default away from VIM.

    Git’s authors were the first users. The team that started the linux kernel project created it and used it because no other version control tool in existence at that time suited their needs. The subtle implication that you, as a user of git, know better than the authors, who were the original users, is laughable.

    Lmao, the idea that we should hero worship every decision Linus Torvalds ever made is the only thing laughable here.