• JigglySackles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        No one is saying it’s not. Your statement’s implication is that because follow up costs are so low that the upfront is negligable, but that’s fallacious as it’s still significant and potentially out of reach for someone that wasn’t planning on spending as much as a car upfront.

        • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Your statement’s implication is …

          I’m gonna say the same thing after my cat wakes up:

          “Ooooo big stretch.”

            • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              In this case, when I wrote “You got all of that”, my statement’s implication was that I read your whole comment.

              Having a hard time comprehending any comments? Maybe I should type slower for you.