I’ll start. Non serious answers also welcome

  1. Linux (Linux)

  2. FOSS or die

  3. Video content should have been text

  4. Not caring a LOT about privacy makes you a non-lemmy normie

(…)

  • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    5. We don’t talk about Reddit here. Except when we do.
    6. [De]federation is srs bizniz.
    7. Seize the means of production computation.
    8. People from that instance over there are bad.

  • thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Your YouTube link should have been a Piped link but it’s okay.

    You’re free to enjoy the lemmit.online content, but don’t interact with it or you will appear confused.

    Don’t stress about upvotes/downvotes-- They’re even more made up here than usual.

    Never pass up an opportunity to bitch about ads, Chrome, Reddit, capitalism, Arch users, streaming services, or your favorite Lemmy client.

    Do not attempt the Picard Maneuver unless you’re sure you know what you’re doing.

  • muse@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    18: Don’t feed the tankies
    19: if you didn’t like Star Trek before, go to Risa and count the lights till you do

  • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago
    1. If you get kicked from an instance, upon joining a new instance, make your first post a furious comment on the admins/mods/hivemind of the instance that kicked you, completely forgetting we can all see the modlog.
  • U de Recife@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My aside:

    In every community I see this. There are always folks trying to narrow the community to some cut and dry descriptors—which for them are always obvious.

    Sometimes the jab is perhaps intended as a joke. But to my reading it’s always a trope, namely the tired fallacy of taking a part as the whole.

    Either way, it’s myopic. In any internet community, we’re always bound to narrowly see what’s happening. Because:

    • We can only see the posters, never the lurkers—which far exceed the former;
    • Posters, by virtue of taking the time to post, are most often than not highly opinionated;
    • Our reading is always selective. We’re either misguided by the way the comments are sorted, by our mood at the moment, by chance, or simply because we’re really bad at reading;
    • Our reading is always biased. Either by our mood, our current situation in life, our upbringing, our milieu, whatever;
    • the list goes on and on and on.

    This results in a very reductive view that, although very teasing because very personal and idiosyncratic, is ultimately an exercise in futility. To those already biased, it simply supplies them with fodder to confirm what they already believed.

    From afar, it’s just noise. Any view on what the community is is but a poor reflection of what the community ultimately is.

  • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Always refer to the whole of threadiverse as ‘Lemmy”.

    (Hello from kbin)🙂

    To be fair, I think this is quite understandable

  • Poringo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I have been curating my experience on lemmy by muting communities I don’t care for like politics, sports, some Linux communities, and also I always filter NSFW.

    I have never been happier because I don’t see what I don’t care for.

    • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We really need to abolish the concept of “normies” people who categorise people like that can fuck off.

      Normal doesn’t exist. The definition of what normal behaviour is is too fluid among different social and age groups to fit.

  • Rokk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    FOSS but also no ads. And don’t harvest any data to sell either.

    I genuinely don’t understand where revenue streams are meant to come from for any of this software with peoples expectations.

    But honestly Lemmy is so pro piracy that it doesn’t really matter if you were to charge for your product

    • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      People being mad at youtube for trying to force people to pay for the insanely expensive service they are providing was/is strange to me, on a similar note.

      For FOSS, it’s sort of given in the name though. If it’s not free, it wouldn’t be FOSS, and companies like Google and Facebook have permanently destroyed most people trust in ads not also being paired with data harvesting. Other than offering paid tech support, it’s difficult to find a non intrusive way to get money.

      People want prefer a tiny icon in the description where the author(s) ask for donations, but don’t they dare pop up donations to ask for donations though!

    • Ace T'Ken@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The internet existed for a long time prior to monetization of it. People used to do things because they were good ideas, fun, or helpful.

      Revenue streams made things worse.