• Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Going from being in your 30s to 50s living a hard life in the desert wastes will do this, yes. Is anyone surprised?

      • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Man, some people aged quickly back then.

        Saw the same thing watching a show from the early 70s. Most of the actors that were in their 50s looked absolutely wrecked. Like 50 going on 90.

        Makes me feel better about myself, though lol.

        Guessing it was a combination of smoking, lead exposure, air pollution, and not much sunscreen.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Similarly a lot of my 2x and 3x great grandparents looked better in their 60s, 70s, and even 80s than their kids and grandkids. Most of them wouldve been born in rural regions around the late 1800s so I suspect you are correct in what made folks age faster.

        • Square Singer@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, true. Grandpa Guinness on the right is just 63 in that picture.

          Lets see how we look like in our 60’s with all the microplastics inside us ;)

          But it shouldn’t be worse than smoking, lead, smog and missing sunscreen

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I watched that yesterday and I don’t have the heart to stop giving chocolate to my daughter, but I don’t know that I’ll be eating it any longer.

      • misterdoctor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        On my life I didn’t click the link but I know it’s that John Oliver episode and I’m scared to watch it because I love chocolate. I know that’s selfish but I don’t have a lot of just for me things I enjoy and I’m loathe to take one away.

        • ShootBANGdang@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s almost literally everything we consume in modern society. It all has costs that hurt someone along the way. Exploitation is a part of capitalism. Only you can draw your line in the sand.

          • misterdoctor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            It would do the opposite of help unless by “help” you mean “encourage me to make better decisions about my health and wellness”

    • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      They also have starships, so many droids they are considered junk, and fully working replacement limbs. I have to assume they can fix bad skin. I guess it’s like Patrick Stewart/Picard’s “in the future nobody cares if you’re bald”.

      • Narrrz@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        star wars isn’t a utopian society, though. lukes family can’t afford or won’t spend the money on a droid that could do all the work for them. or the might be supply issues on tatooine - they buy c3po and r2 off jawas, after all.

        • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          10 months ago

          In The Phantom Menace they didn’t even use Republic standard currency on Tatooine. I don’t think it’s a stretch to assume that they don’t have access to all the most advanced technology in the galaxy.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Raiders, both Tuscan and your average shitbags thieves. You can’t have nice things that are autonomous when people want to take them.

      • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        I mean…none of what you said is incorrect, but none of it precludes the premise either.

        On Earth here in 2023 we have cars and trucks, yet many people in developing countries still walk or ride animals to get where they need to go.

        E-waste is a major issue and smartphones are ubiquitous, yet there are still areas even in the US that have limited or no Internet access, and in developing countries, access to even fresh water, let alone electricity and Internet, can be hard to come by.

        We are capable of amazing medical feats like gene therapy and advanced prosthetics, yet millions lack access to basic care, and millions more die from preventable disease every year.

        So maybe in Star Wars it’s less an issue of “they have bad skin because there’s nothing that can be done about it” and more, “They’re poor people struggling to get by in an unforgiving, backwater location, so that type of care is inaccessible, prohibitively expensive, or seen as a non-essential luxury.”

      • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        IDK, maybe not. It’s easy to think of space travel and robotics as more complex than medicine, but I don’t think that’s necessarily true. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if we have mass produced droids before we’ve totally cured skin aging. Maybe not interstellar travel, but you never know

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I guess it’s like Patrick Stewart/Picard’s “in the future nobody cares if you’re bald”.

        Then why do all the ladies love Riker and his glorious hair?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Patrick Stewart was People Magazine’s Sexiest Man Alive despite being bald. Frakes never got that cover. I’m just saying.

          Also, Picard was able to string Beverly along for years through his charm alone.

  • blargerer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    What if I told you… those actors are more or less all the correct ages, and if anything the younger cast is a bit older than it should be.

  • Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Have you never lived in the Midwest? There’s not much to do.

    By which I mean, this is more meth than weather

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s why nobody is using it, they don’t want to wear sunscreen that’s made of shit.

  • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The ages of Alec Guinness and Ewan McGregor pretty much track actually. It’s just that a 63 year old looked a lot older in the 70s. Tom Cruise is 61 now, Keanu Reeves is 59. Ewan McGregor is 52 now and the events of Obi-Wan are about ten years before EP. 4.

  • jopepa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    How much better would Rogue One have been if they took a quick 20 minutes to explain how sand effects time dilation? But no, we gotta have some stupid hallway scene and emotional stakes. Unwatchable.

      • jopepa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Right?! How many times do we give a shit about Alan Tudyk playing dead? Congratulations, you were likeable and we miss you now!

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Spend 20 years in the desert and you’ll see it will have done a number on your skin!

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t know that life on Empire-era Tatooine was quite as bad as life as a woman in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, but maybe.

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        They still had chattel slavery while the Republic was around and it was controlled by a mafia family and they had to constantly be on the lookout for the Native population that did not like them being there.

        Or check out pictures of impoverished farmers in the Great Depression. Even the 18 year olds looked old. Here is homesteader Jim Norris at 37 years old:

        https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jim_Norris,_homesteader_1a34135v.jpg

  • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s also been pointed out before that they also somehow can’t produce good quality textiles either.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 months ago

      No, but if you want to make it rich in the Star Wars galaxy, be a cloak salesman. You will never go out of business selling cloaks in that galaxy.