• 0ddysseus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    61
    ·
    10 months ago

    Nope, its a vote to change the consimtitution to add a body which is for one racial group and then to decide its powers after its been created. Its undemocratic and racist

      • Turun@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        10 months ago

        It is undemocratic and racist if the position is filled by an elected person and it is based on the race of people. That’s like directly derived from the very definition of those words.

        It can still be morally correct though!

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          You’re being a dolt. They’re there because of their quasi sovereign pre invasion nationality, you see it as color they see it as an attachment to the land.

          • Turun@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yes, that’s why I say it can still be morally correct to create this position in parliament. Quite frankly I think they should get more than just this one position. It boggles the mind how land can just be taken and the native population just ignores like this for centuries.

            But if it’s based on race it’s racist. That’s a fact. Unless you redefine racist to be only against minorities. Or only against non-white people. But for me racism is action based on the race of people.

            • Madison420@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Agreed.

              Nope. Not even by the definition of racism. It’s equity, equitable things can be based on protected classes, sure.

        • steakmeout@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          As opposed to what exactly, non humans?

          Your delineation of race is bigoted and frankly stupid. Also, morally incorrect.

          • Turun@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            My edit didn’t go through. It should read

            It is undemocratic and racist if the position is (edit: not!) filled by an elected person and it is based on the race of people.

            (I blame the federated nature of lemmy for that, but in the future I need to double check if any corrections do reach the intended server.)


            I am aware that some people think racism can only be done by white people or by the majority. My definition of racism is that it is action based on the race of people.

            I’m from Germany and quite frankly, I think the concept of race is indeed stupid. We got rid of that concept and its everyday use 75 years ago. But it is commonly used in the anglosphere (no doubt due to the big influence of the USA and it’s domestic problems with african-american citzens), so that’s the word I use in internet discourse as well.

      • 0ddysseus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        No I haven’t cos I’m not. I’m only interested in preserving democracy. That means equality and egalitarianism. Representative government, which we already fucking have.

        • kaffiene@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          White Australians just standing up for democracy and egalitarianism. How noble. First nations people dying at 50 yo will no doubt salute your brave stance

          • 0ddysseus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            White Australians making decisions on things they don’t understand because of guilt for things the British empire did. How noble.

            • kaffiene@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              The Brits were dicks. But its current white australians getting their knickers in a twist being merely asked to listen to the people who’s land they stole.

    • rainynight65@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is completely false, but unfortunately that is the type of lie that has been spread and amplified by conservatives and their media, and caused a lot of uncertainty and fear in people.

      It is clear what the voice is going to be. It is clear what powers it will have. It is clear how it is going to work. Everything else is FUD.

      • 0ddysseus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        What are you on about? How is it clear? if anything its deliberately unclear. Theres no framework, no restrictions, no indicationonf membership or how it will be chosen, no scope of any kind.

        How the fuck does that parse as “clear” in your mind?

        • rainynight65@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          If it’s so unclear as you make it out to be, how can you be so certain that it will be all the bad things you’re harping on about in this thread?