• doofer_name@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hate point 2 and 3.

    I have an avarage travel of 45-55 minutes from my home city to the city I work in. By car and by train, while the train is usually on the slower end. It takes about 20-30 minutes to get from my home to the train station by taking the bus or riding the bike. When taking the bus I also have to factor in about 15 minutes between arrival at the station and departure of the train. Then there is another 20 minutes from the train station at destination to my place of work. So it takes me 40-65 minutes longer taking the train… twice a day, making it 1:20-2:10h a day (when Im lucky bc trains over here have frequent delays). One hour ish doesn’t sound like much? Well you’ll feel it if you working 11-12h a shift or a 9-10 hour a day in a normal 9 to 5 job (starting work at around 7 a.m.).

    Then there is a neat little think called night or late shifts. There is no way I’m gonna take the train here. They either take an hour longer or the bus at my home city does not drive anymore on the way back.

    Demand better public transportation. Demand functioning trains and frequent bus and tram connections. But do not tell people that need to take the car for whatever reason, that they should just take the worse option and make them feel like the problem.

    I hate cars. I hate driving. And I love taking the train or taking the bike within my city. But sometimes I just have to take the car. That is not my fault tho, since public transportation is not the main focus of politics over here. And thats what needs to change globally.

    • zerofk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I switched from using the bus to going by bike, i cut my commute time by more than half. If I were to take the car, it would halve again. Public transport is great, and necessary. But it will never be faster than a personal car for anything but large distances.

      • Flumsy@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        … where you live. Where I live (in central Europe) we have a subway every 2-3 minutes and you’re at worst 2 blocks away from a stop. It all depends on the infrastructure. A subway cant be stuck in traffic…

        • pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep. Here in Berlin traveling to my old office (when I didn’t work from home all the time) with the S or U-bahn took 30-35 minutes and by car/taxi about 40-45 minutes due to the traffic.

          • TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Berlin is one of the few german cities where public transport is done right. In cologne, where I lived, there are a lot of stops, but the inferstructure is just realy bad. They managed that trains get stuck in traffic too sometimes. And for some reason they trains only arrive in a 10-30min time window. So if you want to follow one line it’s relatively fine, but if you have to change trains you have to be lucky. In the city center still faster than driving though.

        • ikarushagen2@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just say central european city.

          I too live in central europe and the bus line i could take from my town to the town i work in takes 1 hr to get there and back, at the end of my day the bus only departes one hour after i’m finished with work so i have to wait for the bus the same amount of time i need for both ways with my car.

          • dafo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            They should really say a European city with a subway. Not all cities in Europe have a subway.

            • Flumsy@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It was pretty obvious from my comment that I live in a European city with a subway…

              I didnt say my comment applied to all European cities either.

        • Cows Look Like Maps@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Also, trams/streetcars in Zurich have right of way and the red lights change for them. Which is completely logical considering how many more people you can fit in them than a few cards at a red light. The problems with public transit in North America are a function of our car infrastructure.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It sure is nice that everyone gets to live in New York, London, and Washington.

          A better solution is to reduce how much people need to travel. Instead of building trillion-dollartransit systems so people can to to the office we should be taxing the everloving shit out of office spaces for jobs that can be worked remotely.

          • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why not both? I live in Stockholm and work from home. I have amazing trains that I could take to work, and I’ve never had a commute longer than 40 minutes. But a 0 minute commute is still shorter than 5minute commute.

            • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because not everyone can live in fucking Stockholm.

              An apartment within 40 miles of my office in the city costs 5x as much per month as where I live. I can’t get a fucking pizza delivered to my house, much less a bus. And unless I want to smell like a bum at work the 5+months a year it’s over 100° outside, I need to drive to the nearest bus station if I want to take transit. So I’m already having to drive and park somewhere. Then I have to pay to park at the bus station and pay again to ride the bus that drops me off 9 blocks from my office, where I’d have to walk the rest of the way.

              All told it’d add 2-3 hours to my commute and be more expensive than driving.

              But if 100% of the work I do is on the computer at the office. The real solution is to not have the fucking office at all.

              • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                There are obviously other systemic problems. Cities being designed around cars isn’t the only one.

                But your rage shouldn’t be directed at the people who want to make public transit options suck less.

              • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yeah that’s definitely a challenge, and I believe it is a failure of city planning.

                My condo is worth $300k and is within 15min of central Stockholm. The housing crisis is definitely a problem around the world, but European cities that don’t have the missing middle problem are in a much better place.

                Back on topic, even if you could work from home, it would still take you over an hour to go grocery shopping or buy a pizza, which is a huge problem. Both of those things are within a 15 min walk for me.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m in Vancouver, while the system needs some improvement, the skytrain gets me right to the airport, with trains every few minutes. No parking nonsense. Driving, with traffic, is much longer. Bussing has some express routes so the trips aren’t so many stops also. until the system wxpands develooment the consideration is looking for a place nearer a stop or station.

      • DrRatso@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        A bike is faster in my city if you are decently fast, but a bus or trolley is faster than cars during rush hours, because we have public transit lanes, so while everyone in their tin cans is stressed yelling at the dumbass who just cut them off im breezing past, listening to a podcast, meditating or catching a quick ten minute nap before work.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I tried taking my family out on a weekend on transit. 40 minutes wait for a bus that had any room, an hour to travel 10km, and it cost us $10 each way for the family. I live in a major city but our transit is trash. It’s not fit for a city of this size.

      • doofer_name@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That sounds horrible. Public transportation is such a vital thing for citys to function properly as a place to live and not just work in. And dont get me started on small towns or the countryside where not owning a car basically means you’re fucked. I cannot wrap my head around how politicians just fail to see this. Climate change might be the most urgent, but by far not the only argument for better public transportation.

      • ahto@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not fit for a city of this size.

        Tokyo would like to have a word with you. It’s not public transit in and of itself that is the issue, it’s the implementation.

        • candybrie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think you read that wrong. They aren’t saying public transit doesn’t work in a city that size, but the public transit in their city isn’t up to the standard it should be for a city that size.

    • cadekat@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      How likely is it that your home and work are 20 minutes away from train stations because your region prioritizes cars?

      • doofer_name@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Its not just likely, thats the case. But living in the inner city is expensive here. And thats the case in most of the country.

  • Stuka@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    This memes community should be named 'Wannabe Activitists"

  • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Am from Germany and went to Nuremburg to visit a convention.
    The public transit is night and day between those two places.
    Only had to wait about <10min for the next bus.
    I believe the accomodation is not very outside or inside of the transit serving area but it is surprising what a subway and a good schedule can do for one.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve done that. You just bring something appropriate to carry it in.

      Although now that I live closer to a smaller grocer, I just walk twice.

    • I mean the idea is that good urban planning would enable shorter and more frequent grocery store trips. Rather than a supercenter supplying everyone within 30 miles, requiring long drives, you’d have things distributed by need, i.e. general food stores every couple miles, more specialist places potentially farther away. Our current layout and shopping habits are contingent on car infrastructure and massive federal subsidies.

      Would also decrease waste and increase general health, since fresher, less processed food could be purchased.

    • rallatsc@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I will say that I’ve been able to bring 3-4 grocery bags onto a bus, which is enough to last me around 2 weeks. I’ve done this fairly consistently (basically whenever it’s too cold/snowy to bike) for the last couple years. It might not be possible for a family without more than one person making the trip, but for an individual it can definitely work.

      • rug_burn@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t mean this the way it’s going to sound, but…

        I’m happy it works for you, and you’re happy with it. It doesn’t work for everyone.

        • rallatsc@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I completely understand that, and I know that’s why a lot of people need cars. I was primarily responding to the parent comment claiming that it wouldn’t work for anyone because it’d be impossible to bring enough groceries with you on the bus/train.

          • rug_burn@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh, I see now. Sorry about that. Yes it’s possible to use public transport in cases where you don’t need much and the time necessary isn’t outlandish. I think I was conflating several messages in my head when I responded to yours. Glad to see some people are able to be civil here.

    • Gabu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      In civilized countries, it’s common. Even on bicycles, by the way.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Three or four bags of groceries is totally doable on a bus or train.

        • SeaJ@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          A week’s worth for my family of four is generally two bags. Shopping for more than that just leaves a bunch of rotten produce.

    • gareins@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is ok though, going once per 14days for that 90% of stuff and having your car for that is ok. Otherwise if you run out of something, hop to your nearest store. Also here some of my friends and family are not reachable via public transport so I use car for that. But dont use it for commute every day, going to the beach/mountains every weekend, going to the store every other day, taking kids to school and back etc. For many this is completely doable but people are lazy

    • soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Grocery delivery is quick and cheap to 99% of UK. Also I’ve been on a bus plenty of times with enough shopping to last two humans a week.

      Problem is the people who have 5 mouths to feed and want enough food for 3 weeks. In that case, get a delivery

    • Illegal_Prime@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have my own cart that I walk to the store with, I never have much trouble with it, and it’s super useful when I need to get heavy things like milk. I’ve never brought it on the metro as I’ve never had any reason to, but it would not be too difficult to do so. It’s no more difficult than carrying a suitcase or two to the airport.

        • BURN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can’t sing along at the top of my lungs though, which is the only place I can because the walls of my apartment are too thin.

          Driving to and from places is way more relaxing than being on transit imo. Transit has always been significantly more stressful for me and never lines up with when I need to use it.

          • SternburgExport@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            For me it’s the other way around. Public transit is more relaxing since I can just sit down and relax and don’t have to deal with all these idiots that drive like they have to arrive at their destination half an hour ago.

  • Rayspekt@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Great meme and even better because its true.

    Imagine getting driven everywhere and still choosing doing it on your own. These people need Steam Decks, I tell you.

  • workerONE@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Stop driving cars because places were not supposed to be driven to.” Wow that’s a good point /s

    • psud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My city was designed to be driven to. It was built after cars were common

      But it’s still quicker to get from suburbia to city by bike than bus, but car is quicker still

    • Cows Look Like Maps@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Traffic engineering isn’t a university program and we’re still using studies from the 50’s to dictate our traffic engineering. It’s civil engineers in NA who are forced to follow outdated policy which maximizes for car traffic flow, regardless of body count or overall flow of poeple across all transit options. Generally, city planners are all for public transit and walkable and bike able cities but have to battle with politicians appealing to suburbanites with cars.

      • InputZero@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t understand why this is such a hard thing for people and government to understand. Your car isn’t going to a place, you and the stuff you need to carry are. The car is just the means and there are many other means to do so, they just get a lot less attention and funding. Cars and traffic infrastructure have been subsidised for over a century now. Of course cars more developed, and of course we build our cities for cars, we’re socializing cars.

        Yes, there are many areas that have been developed so car focused that it’s a necessity to own a car. People living in rural areas will always need personal cars. People in urban and suburban areas probably don’t and should give up their personal vehicles so Farmer can keep theirs.

  • cyberpunk007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love how people just come up with this shit with their knowledge of their local area. Any train here requires driving to, and does not come and go frequently, and takes longer. Our infra is terrible.

    On the flip side, some places have awesome infra and I wish I had that. I’d prefer to pedal bike if I could. But where I’m at you’re very likely to be killed without bike lanes or sidewalks, and it would take hours to get anywhere important - IE work.

  • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    PLACES WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE DRIVEN TO

    Says who? Is there some natural law when the universe was created that said mankind are not allowed to drive?

    YEARS OF BUILDING CAR INFRASTRUCTURE yet NO DECREASE IN OVERALL TRAVEL TIME

    Ok you go and set off on foot on a 200km journey, and a car sets off at the same time to get to the same place, who will get there first?

    Want to go somewhere fast? We have a vehicle for that; It’s called a “TRAIN”

    Trains are great at moving people / goods between urban areas, but are awful (obviously) for point-to-point journeys. Want to the doctors fast? Can’t exactly get on the the train directly outside your house to the front door of the doctors. I like trains, I use them where I can and always use them whenever I go into the office, but you cannot seriously suggest using trains to totally replace cars, it’s so ridiculous that I’d swear you’ve never even seen one.

    “i am DRIVING my…”

    Not sure what’s deranged about it? In fact that case is very valid as you’re likely to have a lot of shopping (two weeks worth) that you’d really struggle to carry on public transport. It might have a bit more authenticity if you said it was just to get some bread and milk.


    I get the sentiment, we should totally be trying to reduce our car usage and planning our urban environments to favour walking, cycling and public transport, but the fuckcars community on here are totally deranged. Your arguments look ridiculous and aren’t going to convince anyone.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There does seem to be a high proportion of city dwellers wondering why somebody who lives four miles from the nearest shop that sells something more substantial than Budweiser and crisps would need a car…

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Was there ever any doubt that people who dislike cars live in walkable cities? They can’t conceive that someone could live in another place that doesn’t have the same infrastructure they do. The idea of being out in the middle of nowhere with 40 acres of land doesn’t even cross their minds because to them everyone lives in an urban environment or should be able to make the same solutions work.

        It’s also weird that they classify getting groceries for two weeks as strange, like do you guys not have natural disasters? You just buy groceries for the next day? What do you do when the shelves go bare during things like Covid or a hurricane? I guess you turn into looters, since you apparently think planning for anything beyond the next day is “deranged.” God forbid someone has some extra rice and beans to get through a period of logistics failure.