cross-posted from: https://lemmy.fmhy.ml/post/726542

I have ~100 users downloaded ~1000 of my files in the last week alone. Music piracy is still alive and kicking. I encourage everyone to download and install SoulseekQT/Nicotine+/Seeker-Android and share whatever kind of music you have for everybody to download. Let’s bring back music piracy!

  • Brochetudo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Streaming sites are convenient up until you want to listen to that mildly obscure artist from your country your parents used to listen to back in the early 50s. Then it’s absolute bollocks.

    • frazorth@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not even old music.

      Architecture In Helsinki is missing the third album on Spotify. There are plenty more, but that’s always the first that pops in my head whenever I’m listening to Indie playlists, Of Montréal comes on and I realise I haven’t heard Places Like This in a long time. Then I remember why, and I either have to dig through my old CD collection or download it.

    • Briongloid@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or if you live outside of America, the number of albums that don’t let you play some of the songs is insane.

    • RunAwayFrog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Just as the other user said, using YouTube Audio for this stuff is the way to go.

      Just look for <Artist Name> - Topic channels and check the playlists (not the uploads). You should find full albums uploaded directly by copyright holders. Use a VPN if you don’t find anything. Sometimes stuff from your region will not be available in your region, but available if you appear to be somewhere else ;)

      Also, if we are going old style P2P, and not using torrents for some reason (RuTracker deserves a special mention), then DC++ should come before SoulseekQT/Nicotine+ anyway.

      Mostly lossless grabs from torrents + YouTube Audio (edit: using yt-dlp), and you have a selection with guaranteed high quality*. Definitely better than whatever scattered MP3s in SoulseekQT/Nicotine+

      * Opus@150kbits/s is transparent, except for some killer samples heard by a trained ear.

      • TornadoValley@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve found DC++ public hubs garbage. The private ones are amazing but near impossible to get into if you’re not already familiar. What hubs are you recommending that are better than Soulseek?

        • RunAwayFrog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What hubs are you recommending that are better than Soulseek?

          I hardly use DC++ anymore. I mentioned it because I didn’t find anything unique about Soulseek when I tried it last a few years ago. But I did grab plenty of classical music in lossless format from DC++, using public hubs.

          So, it’s the “are better than Soulseek?” part of the question that intrigues me. What’s good about Soulseek? For lossless collections, it doesn’t (didn’t?) have much. For lossy stuff? There are better (in selection, availability, and quality) places to grab lossy files from (e.g. YouTube). And Torrents (with or without DC++) would probably have you covered there too anyway.

          That is/was my experience with all these platforms/networks. I’m open to learn something new if I’m missing something.

    • kat@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      My parents favourite music artists finally popped up on Spotify about 5 years ago. It was a dry run until then - I was PISSED when my brother lost my CD of a band I liked when we went back home on vacation.

    • Ansis100@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s why I pay for YouTube Music. YouTube has a pretty good collection of obscure tracks and it lets you upload your own files to access anywhere.

      • zarkony@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        YouTube has a pretty good collection of obscure tracks

        This is because current Youtube policy effectively bundles ContentID and YouTube Music. Basically if a rightsholder wants to put audio into ContentID, they are forced to also publish it on Youtube Music (topic channels).

  • TornadoValley@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Music piracy isn’t dead but it’s a shell of what it was. You can see even here most people would rather just stream

    Soulseek needs more users though as the proportion of locked file users keeps increasing

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tbh, why pirate music when I can listen to a new album within 5 seconds of its release? I don’t have to wait for downloads, don’t have to deal with mistaken metadata, I don’t have to worry about physical storage sizes.

      I fully support piracy for basically everything, but we should count ourselves lucky that music streaming went the way it did and not the way movie and series streaming has gone.

      • TornadoValley@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You don’t own the music so it can be edited/taken away as desired by the DSP

        Also me personally very little of what I listen to is on DSPs and a lot isn’t even on YouTube but I recognize this as an extreme outlier

      • elghoto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If a band is popular, albums get ripped/downloaded from streaming services and put on private music trackers within hours of release.

        If you don’t have space, like recommendations from streaming services, or their app, or not wanting to catalog your music (or setup services that do that), then I would recommend a streaming application.

      • Briongloid@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I use deemix for 320kbps, I originally had FLAC but as almost 100% of my listening is remote from my server I found 320 to be great.

        I’m no Hi-Fi listener, but YT rips suck.

          • ApplePie@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not at all. For a lot of people, hi-fi audio is basically indistinguishable from “regular” audio, and you also need things like a DAC and good headphones to hear it. Bluetooth, as an example, can’t even play hi-fi audio at its full quality.

        • RunAwayFrog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          YouTube has audio in Opus format@~150kbit/s. Opus is a much better format than MP3. Almost all audio is completely transparent at that bitrate, where with MP3s, there are cases where audio is not transparent without using non standard >320kbit/s bitrates (a lot of content is transparent @320kbits/s though).

          Now, sites/tools like the one you mentioned take the Opus (or AAC) file/stream from YouTube, and lossily re-encodes it again, probably to a file that is larger than the original, with at best the same quality, but probably worse quality. You obviously can’t get better output than the input in lossy compression.

          So, the disk space argument is weird if you can play Opus/AAC (should be playable on every device nowadays).

          This is the valid part for why you shouldn’t use YT-to-MP3 converters.

          But there are also invalid reasons why people will tell you it’s shit:

          • They think all MP3s sound like the shit ones from a decade (or two, or three) ago, using low bitrates and/or created with shit encoders. In reality, not all MP3s sound like shit, but vigilance is needed at every encoding step, as is the case with all lossy conversions.
          • They are conflating the quality of the conversion, with the quality of the source, and think the bad quality of some user-uploaded YouTube content is due to the lossy conversion done by YouTube, and/or the MP3 converter re-encoding from YouTube. Content uploaded by the copyright holders (assuming basic competence) does not have that problem at all.
            • RunAwayFrog@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Soulseek is an old-style P2P network. It has nothing to do with my parent comment. I personally don’t use it (see my other comments in this thread).

              If you want to grab a non-reencoded file from YouTube, you can use a tool like yt-dlp

              # see what formats are available for a YT vid
              yt-dlp -F <youtube-url>
              # format 251 is usually available as the highest quality Opus format
              yt-dlp -f 251 <youtube-url>
              

              That last command should grab you an Opus stream in WEBM format.

              If you’re not a CLI guy, others should be able to give you a good GUI recommendation.

    • Ilikeprivacy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mostly listen to jazz, blues and classical. I use rutracker which has everything I want and in lossless formats. Mp3s too but I’m more interested in lossless.

    • croobat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      yt-dlp is the way my friend, I got a command to download a specific playlist of mine every once in a while:

      alias youtube-dl-playlist-guardar="yt-dlp -x -f bestaudio --external-downloader aria2c --external-downloader-args '-c -j 3 -x 3 -s 3 -k 1M' --ignore-errors --continue --audio-format mp3 'https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=_______'"

    • Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      i feel this.

      though have gigabytes of pirated music in my hd, but i cant transfer that all on my phone that’s wy i have spotify

      • elghoto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have you heard of “Navidrome”? you can be your own Spotify. It also supports transcoding. For instance, if you are on a phone connected to data, you can set the bitrate to 128kpbs to save some data.

  • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really don’t feel the need to. I pay fair prices for my music and get it how I want it when I want it where I want it.

    Im not pirating to shaft people out of money

    • coffeekomrade@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you aren’t going to shows and buying from the merch table, or buying directly from bancamp etc you aren’t supporting artists.That’s where the majority of their money comes from.

      • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am supporting the artist to some extent. Stealing Spotify content would be adding insult to injury imo

        • coffeekomrade@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you primarily consume content through Spotify or streaming you are supporting office with fractions of a penny per stream.

            • coffeekomrade@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s fine, just know that this has already been looked in to and reported on with rough numbers on what artists earn and artists themselves talking about it, and you have extremely rose tinted glasses on how all of that actually plays out and the amount of money musicians earn from streaming.

    • Chuuqo@lemmy.fmhy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I buy music on bandcamp/directly from artists all the time. I just dislike streaming services, as I always want to have the files, and the money artists get from them is abbyssmal anyway.

      • ayaya@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Especially for smaller/indie artists I wait for Bandcamp Fridays so all of the money goes straight to them (Fuck Epic). Buying even one album for $5-10 is more than they would earn from thousands of Spotify listens from you.

    • dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hell I wouldn’t be pirating movies and shows if publishers allowed me to pay lol. Unlike Netflix, Prime Video etc, Spotify really gives me pretty much all music

    • Xeelee@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where can you legitimately buy music these days? I’ll be happy to pay if the artist gets their fair share. I used to buy from Amazon but that has gone completely to shit recently. Like they really don’t want you to buy stuff from them any more. And I cannot bring myself to give a cent to Spotify when they paid 100 million to Joe fucking Rogan.

      • Sanrasxz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I generally run Spotify with the XManager version on Android and SpotX on PC. Works great.

        when they paid 100 million to Joe fucking Rogan.

        Why do I care who they paid money to to have some random podcast on their service?

    • sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll be sticking to spotify personally out of convenience, and the fact that I’m paying for a family plan but to be fair paying that money directly to the artists you like will be much more effective while not supporting platforms that pay them very little for their work.

      If you want though, using spotify adblock has been quite effective in my experiance. That way you have the convenience and you don’t pay spotify shit

    • adonis@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here, while I do have the time to chase around pirated movies/games/software, I want my music to just be there with me without all the hassle.

      Spotify’s algorithm is just great!

        • FactorSD@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Spotify sucks, but the whole music industry has sucked like that for literally a hundred years - A very very few artists make bank, about 5% make a little, everyone else makes zero.

          • nicocool84@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh indeed, I dont’t think it was better before. But technology should be about making things better, shouldn’t it?

      • Sentinian@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Spotify probably is the only algorithm I use that just gives me stuff I would enjoy, other services try to push bs I don’t want. While I use soulseek and buy from Bandcamp when possible I still use Spotify for discovery.

  • what@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Soulseek is great for finding and sharing music. I would strongly recommend Nicotine+ over the old SoulseekQt

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t forget stream ripping. I used to rip internet radio direct to MP3 with no quality loss and then go back and manually edit the files for playback gaps, keeping the best in case of duplicate recordings. If you have really niche interests it sometimes was literally the only way to get copies of some tracks, especially rare remixes.

  • radau@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve got slskd and lidarr set up with jellyfin and FinAmp on my phone and honestly I don’t open Spotify except to discover new music

    • dabnpits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you saying you can use slskd as a source in Lidarr? If so, I’d love some details on how to set that up.

      • NooNz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not possible yet, but lidarr integration is one of the milestones of slskd. There’s a nice thread about it on the github project. Can’t remember if it is lidarr’s or slskd’s though

      • radau@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh man I wish no it’s a little more manual but still a lot nicer for me than a desktop client then uploading to the server

    • Sentinian@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bandcamp is an excellent option, I often try to get releases from their when possible.

    • Chuuqo@lemmy.fmhy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do when I can afford to, but you can’t really buy every song you listen to, can you?

        • Emerald_Earth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          With Spotify, both you and artists are still screwed.

          If you have Spotify free you will be interrupted by ads breaking all immersion in your albums. Artists will get paid barely anything.

          If you have Spotify Premium, you will have to pay money, and most of that money won’t even go towards the artists. The artists will get paid a little more then barely anything.

    • Chuuqo@lemmy.fmhy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      SoulseekQT and Nicotine+ are on desktop. You can find Seeker-Android on IzzyOnDroid or github.

  • JelloBrains@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I waffle on whether I should use my VPN or not with it.

    Support your favourite artists directly. That wasn’t an option in the Napster days.

    I like to have the older versions of songs before they “Remaster” and change them and if they stop selling everything but the remasters, it’s time to fire it up.