cross-posted from: https://lemmy.fmhy.ml/post/726542

I have ~100 users downloaded ~1000 of my files in the last week alone. Music piracy is still alive and kicking. I encourage everyone to download and install SoulseekQT/Nicotine+/Seeker-Android and share whatever kind of music you have for everybody to download. Let’s bring back music piracy!

  • Brochetudo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Streaming sites are convenient up until you want to listen to that mildly obscure artist from your country your parents used to listen to back in the early 50s. Then it’s absolute bollocks.

    • frazorth@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not even old music.

      Architecture In Helsinki is missing the third album on Spotify. There are plenty more, but that’s always the first that pops in my head whenever I’m listening to Indie playlists, Of Montréal comes on and I realise I haven’t heard Places Like This in a long time. Then I remember why, and I either have to dig through my old CD collection or download it.

    • Briongloid@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or if you live outside of America, the number of albums that don’t let you play some of the songs is insane.

    • RunAwayFrog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Just as the other user said, using YouTube Audio for this stuff is the way to go.

      Just look for <Artist Name> - Topic channels and check the playlists (not the uploads). You should find full albums uploaded directly by copyright holders. Use a VPN if you don’t find anything. Sometimes stuff from your region will not be available in your region, but available if you appear to be somewhere else ;)

      Also, if we are going old style P2P, and not using torrents for some reason (RuTracker deserves a special mention), then DC++ should come before SoulseekQT/Nicotine+ anyway.

      Mostly lossless grabs from torrents + YouTube Audio (edit: using yt-dlp), and you have a selection with guaranteed high quality*. Definitely better than whatever scattered MP3s in SoulseekQT/Nicotine+

      * Opus@150kbits/s is transparent, except for some killer samples heard by a trained ear.

      • TornadoValley@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve found DC++ public hubs garbage. The private ones are amazing but near impossible to get into if you’re not already familiar. What hubs are you recommending that are better than Soulseek?

        • RunAwayFrog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What hubs are you recommending that are better than Soulseek?

          I hardly use DC++ anymore. I mentioned it because I didn’t find anything unique about Soulseek when I tried it last a few years ago. But I did grab plenty of classical music in lossless format from DC++, using public hubs.

          So, it’s the “are better than Soulseek?” part of the question that intrigues me. What’s good about Soulseek? For lossless collections, it doesn’t (didn’t?) have much. For lossy stuff? There are better (in selection, availability, and quality) places to grab lossy files from (e.g. YouTube). And Torrents (with or without DC++) would probably have you covered there too anyway.

          That is/was my experience with all these platforms/networks. I’m open to learn something new if I’m missing something.

    • kat@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      My parents favourite music artists finally popped up on Spotify about 5 years ago. It was a dry run until then - I was PISSED when my brother lost my CD of a band I liked when we went back home on vacation.

    • Ansis100@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s why I pay for YouTube Music. YouTube has a pretty good collection of obscure tracks and it lets you upload your own files to access anywhere.

      • zarkony@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        YouTube has a pretty good collection of obscure tracks

        This is because current Youtube policy effectively bundles ContentID and YouTube Music. Basically if a rightsholder wants to put audio into ContentID, they are forced to also publish it on Youtube Music (topic channels).