• adr1an@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    That’s human-like intelligence at its finest. I am not being sarcastic, hear me out. If you told a person to give you 10 numbers at random, they can’t. Everyone thinks randomness is easy, but it isn’t ( see: random.org )

    So, of course a GPT model would fail at this task, I love that they do fail and the dog looks so cute!!

    • kaidezee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I mean, here’s a few random numbers out of my head: 1 9 5 2 6 8 6 3 4 0. I don’t get it, why is it supposed to be hard? Sure, they’re not “truly” random, but they sure look random /:

      • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        You have one of each number except 7, and you’re deliberately avoiding doubles and runs of consecutive numbers. Human attempts at randomness tend to be very idealized in that way, and as a result, less random.

      • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 hours ago

        They may look random but arent truly random. Computers are terrible at it too. Thats why cryptography requires external sources to generate “true” random numbers. For example, cloudflare uses a wall of lava lamps to generate randomness for encryption keys.

      • Wizzard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’ve got some more random numbers:

        8 6 7 5 3 0 9 1 1 2 3 5 8 1 2 4 8 1 6 3 2

        It’s not that they look random is enough - They need to BE random.

        Recheck your lava lamp Wall of Entropy and generate some real rands, scrub. (/s)

        • FermionWrangler@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          792654349324138383027654826548192874651875306480462765726382

          I don’t know man, that’s pretty random. I mean do you think you can predict the next numbers in the sequence just from the ones already there? Would have to predict the next batch, the way I made these come in batches. I can’t exactly produce 1 number at a time from banging on my number-pad.

          • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I can make an educated guess what numbers are most likely, yes.

            For example, you have no repeat number sequences, so I can take a guess that the number 2 is less likely to be next.

            Humans have certain tendencies that makes them want to make a number only seem more random. Also, you’ve probably seen those mentalists correctly guessing seemingly random stuff. Tells you enough how easily people are fooled into thinking something specific, so random can you actually be.

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Here’s another set of random digits

        1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

        :3

        After all, there’s no fundamental reason for why it can’t all just be a repeat of the same number. But it doesn’t look random, right? So what is randomness?