He needs to be provided that opportunity before being removed as the law states. He isn’t defending himself in the press. There needs to be some form of inquiry or trial.
How is this so hard for people to figure out? If you get accused of something you have the right to defend yourself.
Removing him without the opportunity to defend himself is NOT the rule of law.
There’s literally nothing stopping him from defending himself. What are you even talking about?
He needs to be provided that opportunity before being removed as the law states. He isn’t defending himself in the press. There needs to be some form of inquiry or trial.
How is this so hard for people to figure out? If you get accused of something you have the right to defend yourself.