“We’re thrilled that Luigi is accepting these funds so that he can mount the strongest defense possible,” said D4 Legal Committee spokesperson Sam Beard in a statement. “The American private health insurance industry has ruined countless lives by denying people access to basic care and burying families in medical debt. It’s no surprise that Luigi’s alleged actions are understood and supported by tens of millions of hard-working Americans.”
This sounds weirdly phrased. He pleads not guilty because he didn’t shoot the CEO and not because he thinks that shooting the CEO shouldn’t be a crime, right?
Which part is confusing you? Healthcare is out of control. And Luigi is not guilty.
Edit: I heard he plead guilty which is not the case. A lot of what I say presumes that was how he plead. Leaving up my comments for completeness of record
I mean, ol’ boy is def guilty of murder.
I think the question is how much was it justified (i.e. what degree of murder charges should he receive) and what’s a reasonable punishment for what he did.
ol’ boy is def guilty of murder.
That’s for the jury to decide. But we do appreciate your opinion here.
Edit: I heard he plead guilty which is not the case. A lot of what I say presumes that was how he plead. Leaving up my comments for completeness of record
Genuine curiosity, but is there really any other conclusion that the jury could come to?
I suppose there’s the “it wasn’t Luigi in that video” argument, and jury nullification is technically on the table, but jury nullification still doesn’t feel the same as “he didn’t do it”.
I’m not a frequenter of this Community, but is popular sentiment here that it’ll play any other way?
Luigi did nothing wrong if he did anything at all.
The state has so far did a lot of propaganda but not a lot of proving his guilt. Let’s see what they bring before the jury.
