• scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hm… risk of nuclear disaster? Or more expense? Hm… I’ll have to think about this one.

      • Anamana@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hm… invest into your companies cybersecurity before or after you get hacked?

        Companies don’t care enough about risks if they are not forced to account for them.

      • PlexSheep@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your logic is fallacious: the solution is not to build a nuclear reactor but seek an alternative.