• scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hm… risk of nuclear disaster? Or more expense? Hm… I’ll have to think about this one.

    • Anamana@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Hm… invest into your companies cybersecurity before or after you get hacked?

      Companies don’t care enough about risks if they are not forced to account for them.

    • PlexSheep@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your logic is fallacious: the solution is not to build a nuclear reactor but seek an alternative.