• Brekky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Is that true? I thought recycling was giving new purpose to an old object. Reuse to me implies another person using the object but in the same way it was originally intended.

      • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        No, that’s reusing. Recycling is breaking down the product into materials so it can be used to make new stuff.

        The cycle in recycle means the production cycle.

        • lugal@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          39 minutes ago

          No, the cycle doesn’t close if you turn one product into a different one. Recycling is melting one bottle and turning into a new bottle. If you turn one product into a lower quality one, it’s downcycling. Unless you are very proud of what you did, than it’s upcycling

        • lengau@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Given that this is changing the product itself, it’s more repurposing than reusing, which I’d say fits between reuse and recycle.

          • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            It works better if you think about the raw materials rather than the whole product;

            Reduce the amount of plastic you use
            Reuse the plastic you already have
            Recycle the plastic you can’t use anymore

      • SeptugenarianSenate@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        What you’re describing is just giving/loaning/borrowing which don’t start with R but still contribute to a moneyless value economy which is still great for improving the efficient sharing of the resource pool toward desirable ends

    • Vinstaal0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Reparing is the first one, idk where reduce comes into the saying.

      Maybe we need to include a 4th R?

      • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I would argue that repair is part of re-use, since you are allowing it to be used again. So would be part of the second r. The first r is reduce, which would boil down to: if you already have one, don’t buy another. It’s more effective to not need the resources in the first place.