No one could remember the James S. Brady briefing room so packed, as new White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt stepped into the lions' den on Tuesday.
That feels like backpedaling to me. Can you explain why you find it interesting? Do you find articles critical of Trump’s administration interesting? Do you have any credentials or credibility or are you just lazy-thumbing propaganda at strangers hoping to ruffle feathers?
Further, what metrics are you using? Do you have any sources of information other than the journalistically bankrupt propaganda machine you cited?
Do you have anything of value to share, or is it all “just interesting” and nothing more?
If you don’t respond you’re admitting that your ideas don’t stand up to scrutiny.
Backpedaling from what? I’m not saying anything different than I have ever said.
Can you explain why you find it interesting?
Youngest press secretary ever. She’s 27 and look where she is. That’s interesting to me.
Do you have any credentials
What are you talking about? I’m a guy on Lemmy posting news articles. You do realize what Lemmy is, right? You can post any article you find interesting. You don’t have to have “credentials.” lmao
Do you have any sources of information other than the journalistically bankrupt propaganda machine
Firstly, I don’t think they are a " journalistically bankrupt propaganda machine." That’s your opinion. I don’t share it. Secondly, I post plenty of articles from other news orgs as well. Feel free to look at my post history: https://sh.itjust.works/u/UniversalMonk?page=1&sort=New&view=Posts
Do you have anything of value to share, or is it all “just interesting” and nothing more?
No, I have nothing of value to share. I find something personally interesting, and then I share it. You are not obligated to read anything that you don’t find interesting.
If you don’t respond you’re admitting that your ideas don’t stand up to scrutiny.
I have no problem responding. But I also have no obligation to explain anything to you.
If you don’t like my articles, feel free to ignore them and/or post your own. You can post them to this community or any others you want to.
In that case, it’s strange that you find her performance so interesting when she suggests that parts of the existing constitution are unconstitutional. I guess I understand the novelty to you; it’s sourceless opinion-dumping from an unqualified person.
I’ll be blocking your community on my instance. We have standards.
Feels like a heavily subjective analysis. Are you just sharing articles you like and then giving your opinion about them?
Just sharing articles that I find interesting.
Thanks!
That feels like backpedaling to me. Can you explain why you find it interesting? Do you find articles critical of Trump’s administration interesting? Do you have any credentials or credibility or are you just lazy-thumbing propaganda at strangers hoping to ruffle feathers?
Further, what metrics are you using? Do you have any sources of information other than the journalistically bankrupt propaganda machine you cited?
Do you have anything of value to share, or is it all “just interesting” and nothing more?
If you don’t respond you’re admitting that your ideas don’t stand up to scrutiny.
Backpedaling from what? I’m not saying anything different than I have ever said.
Youngest press secretary ever. She’s 27 and look where she is. That’s interesting to me.
What are you talking about? I’m a guy on Lemmy posting news articles. You do realize what Lemmy is, right? You can post any article you find interesting. You don’t have to have “credentials.” lmao
Firstly, I don’t think they are a " journalistically bankrupt propaganda machine." That’s your opinion. I don’t share it. Secondly, I post plenty of articles from other news orgs as well. Feel free to look at my post history: https://sh.itjust.works/u/UniversalMonk?page=1&sort=New&view=Posts
No, I have nothing of value to share. I find something personally interesting, and then I share it. You are not obligated to read anything that you don’t find interesting.
I have no problem responding. But I also have no obligation to explain anything to you.
If you don’t like my articles, feel free to ignore them and/or post your own. You can post them to this community or any others you want to.
Donkon, amiko!
In that case, it’s strange that you find her performance so interesting when she suggests that parts of the existing constitution are unconstitutional. I guess I understand the novelty to you; it’s sourceless opinion-dumping from an unqualified person.
I’ll be blocking your community on my instance. We have standards.
I love how you think Lemmy posters need to be qualified. Soooo glad you are not in charge of the fediverse! lol
That sounds like a great idea. Thank you!