I mean, the only thing he’s proposing will fix the issue is other people’s actions. In that statement he isn’t suggesting any solutions nor discussing a plan, hes saying if other people fix other problems it may help prices.
That’s not what the headline says, it says “Trump isn’t going to do anything about grocery prices” which is exactly what his statement confirms. He said it’s hard and it’ll probably be fixed by things outside his control, which is explicitly saying he won’t do a damn thing.
You agree with the president-elect’s assessment that reducing energy costs will result in corporations slashing prices for consumers? Do you just believe him or do you have reason to believe his assessment is accurate
His argument or yours? I want to focus on yours since I’m talking to you :) - I mean, I don’t see him claiming anything about headlines which is what you and I are talking about now
So, to reiterate the argument you’re making here, you’re saying that you believe that when he said he will reduce grocery prices, what he actually meant was that he would reduce energy costs which would then reduce the cost of groceries. The headline suggests he is backtracking but you believe he always intended to use energy prices as the main driver to reduce groceries and that’s why the headline is false. Is that right?
I mean, the only thing he’s proposing will fix the issue is other people’s actions. In that statement he isn’t suggesting any solutions nor discussing a plan, hes saying if other people fix other problems it may help prices.
That seems like abdicating to me.
It’s a far cry from “nevermind, I lied to everyone” like the headline implies.
That’s not what the headline says, it says “Trump isn’t going to do anything about grocery prices” which is exactly what his statement confirms. He said it’s hard and it’ll probably be fixed by things outside his control, which is explicitly saying he won’t do a damn thing.
Part of his platform was lowering energy prices - “Drill, Baby, Drill!” He expects grocery prices to go down as a result.
Why argue with you ? You have changed the subject in bad faith.
My point the whole time has been that the article has a bad headline. If he said something like “We can’t lower prices,” then it’d make sense.
He had a golden opportunity to make that argument and instead talked about how much property he owned and to talk about a loading dock he drove by.
It was part of his platform and the part I emphasized shows him referencing it. The author of this article is misleading people with his headline.
You agree with the president-elect’s assessment that reducing energy costs will result in corporations slashing prices for consumers? Do you just believe him or do you have reason to believe his assessment is accurate
I’m saying that’s his argument. I don’t know if it’ll work out, but this conversation started because the headline is false.
His argument or yours? I want to focus on yours since I’m talking to you :) - I mean, I don’t see him claiming anything about headlines which is what you and I are talking about now
So, to reiterate the argument you’re making here, you’re saying that you believe that when he said he will reduce grocery prices, what he actually meant was that he would reduce energy costs which would then reduce the cost of groceries. The headline suggests he is backtracking but you believe he always intended to use energy prices as the main driver to reduce groceries and that’s why the headline is false. Is that right?
Spoilers: it will not work out that way.
Source: we’ve already seen energy prices go down drastically, grocery prices have continued to go up in that same time